•  
  •  
 

Keywords

mass/count distinction, two-dimensional semantics, nouns, counting, context

Abstract

We argue that two types of context are central to grounding the semantics for the mass/count distinction. We combine and develop the accounts of Rothstein (2010) and Landman (2011), which emphasize (non-)overlap at a context. We also adopt some parts of Chierchia’s (2010) account which uses precisifying contexts. We unite these strands in a two-dimensional semantics that covers a wide range of the puzzling variation data in mass/count lexicalization. Most importantly, it predicts where we should expect to find such variation for some classes of nouns but not for others, and also explains why.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

References

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 2012. ‘Counting and Classifiers’. In Diane Massam (ed.) ‘Count and Mass Across Languages’, 199–219. OUP.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2010. ‘Mass Nouns, Vagueness and Semantic Variation’. Synthese 174: 99–149.

Cooper, Robin. 2012. ‘Type Theory and Semantics in Flux’. In R. Kempson, T. Fernando & N. Asher (eds.) ‘Philosophy of Linguistics, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science’, 271–323. Elsevier.

Cooper, Robin, Dobnik, Simon, Larsson, Staffan & Lappin, Shalom. 2015. ‘Probabilistic Type Theory and Natural Language Semantics’. LILT 10, no. 4.

Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. ‘An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning’. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1: 123–131.

——. 1976. ‘Frame semantics and the nature of language’. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280, no. 1: 20–32.

Grimm, Scott. 2012. Number and Individuation. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.

Krifka, Manfred. 1989. ‘Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics’. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas (eds.) ‘Semantics and Contextual Expression’, 75–115. Foris Publications.

——. 1995. ‘Common Nouns: A Contrastive Analysis of English and Chinese’. In G.N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.) ‘The Generic Book’, 398–411. Chicago University Press.

Landman, Fred. 1992. ‘The Progressive’. Natural Language Semantics 1, no. 1: 1–32.

——. 2011. ‘Count Nouns – Mass Nouns – Neat Nouns – Mess Nouns’. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6: 1–67.

——. this volume. ‘Iceberg Semantics for Count Nouns and Mass Nouns: The evidence from portions’. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition Logic and Communication 11.

Lima, Suzi. 2014. ‘All notional mass nouns are count nouns in Yudja’. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 24: 534–554.

Link, Godehard. 1983. ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach’. In Paul Portner & Barbera Partee (eds.) ‘Formal Semantics - the Essential Readings’, 127–147. Blackwell.

Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Rothstein, Susan. 2011. ‘Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portugese’. Lingua 121: 2153–2175.

Rothstein, Susan. 2010. ‘Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction’. Journal of Semantics 27, no. 3: 343–397.

Soja, Nancy, Carey, Susan & Spelke, Elizabeth. 1991. ‘Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms’. Cognition 38: 179–211.

Sutton, Peter R. & Filip, Hana. 2016a. ‘Counting in context: Count/mass variation and restrictions on coercion in collective artifact nouns’. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26: 350–370.

——. 2016b. ‘Vagueness, overlap, and countability’. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20 (To appear).

——. 2016c. ‘A probabilistic, mereological account of the mass/count distinction’. Pro- ceedings of TbiLLC 2015 (To appear).

——. 2016d. ‘Probabilistic Mereological Type Theory and the Mass/Count Distinction’. Under review for JLM (proceedings of Type Theory and Lexical Semantics (TYTLES) workshop at ESSLLI 2015).

Zucchi, Sandro & White, Michael. 1996. ‘Twigs, Sequences and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates’. In Teresa Galloway & Justin Spence (eds.) ‘Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 6’, 223–270. Ithaca, NY: Linguistic Society of America.

——. 2001. ‘Twigs, Sequences and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, no. 2: 223–270.

Share

COinS