•  
  •  
 

Keywords

philosophy, linguistics

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This paper shows that several sorts of expressions cannot be interpreted metaphorically, including determiners, tenses, etc. Generally, functional categories cannot be interpreted metaphorically, while lexical categories can. This reveals a semantic property of functional categories, and it shows that metaphor can be used as a probe for investigating them. It also reveals an important linguistic constraint on metaphor. The paper argues this constraint applies to the interface between the cognitive systems for language and metaphor. However, the constraint does not completely prevent structural elements of language from being available to the metaphor system. The paper shows that linguistic structure within the lexicon, specifically, aspectual structure, is available to the metaphor system.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

References

Asher, N. and A. Lascarides, 2001. Metaphor in discourse. In P. Bouillon and F. Busa (eds.), The Language of Word Meaning, pp. 262–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896316.017

Baker, M. C., 2003. Lexical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047

Black, M., 1962. Metaphor. In Models and Metaphors, pp. 25–47. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Camp, E., 2005. Critical study of Josef Stern’s Metaphor in Context. Noûs 39:715–731.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00546.x

Camp, E., 2006. Metaphor in the mind: The cognition of metaphor. Philosophy Compass 1:154–170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00013.x

Carston, R., 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603

Chomsky, N., 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, pp. 184–221. Waltham: Ginn and Company.

Chomsky, N., 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

Chomsky, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, N., 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N., 1986b. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.

Davidson, D., 1978. What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5:31–47. Reprinted in Davidson (1984).

Davidson, D., 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dowty, D. R., 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Fodor, J. A., 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Fukui, N., 2001. Phrase structure. In M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 374–406. Oxford: Blackwell.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch12

Gentner, D. and P. Wolff, 1997. Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language 37:331–355.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2527

Glucksberg, S. and B. Keysar, 1993. How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, pp. 401–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn.

Grimshaw, J., 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Grimshaw, J., 2005a. Extended projection. In Words and Structure, pp. 1–73. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Grimshaw, J., 2005b. Semantic structure and semantic content in lexical representation. In Words and Structure, pp. 75–89. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser, 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Higginbotham, J., 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16:547–593.

Higginbotham, J., 1987. The autonomy of syntax and semantics. In J. L. Garfield (ed.), Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding, pp. 119–131. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Higginbotham, J., 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. In J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of Events, pp. 49–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krifka, M., 1998. The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Lakoff, G., 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, pp. 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn.

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson, 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Landman, F., 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1:1–32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02342615

Larson, R. K., 1998. Events and modification in nominals. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 8:145–168.

Larson, R. K. and G. Segal, 1995. Knowledge of Meaning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav, 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav, 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479

McClure, W., 1990. A lexical semantic explanation for unaccusative mismatches. In K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell, and E. Mejías-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical Relations, pp. 305–318. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Mikkelsen, L., 2005. Copular Clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Moro, A., 1997. The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519956

Ortony, A., 1979. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review 86:161–180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.161

Pietroski, P., 2003. The character of natural language semantics. In A. Barber (ed.), Epistemology of Language, pp. 217–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik, 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.

Recanati, F., 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reimer, M. and E. Camp, 2006. Metaphor. In E. Lepore and B. C. Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, pp. 845–863. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rothstein, S., 2004. Structuring Events. Oxford: Blackwell.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470759127

Ryle, G., 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

Searle, J. R., 1979. Metaphor. In Expression and Meaning, pp. 76–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, C. S., 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2nd edn.

Sperber, D. and D. Wilson, 1998. Relevance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Stern, J., 2000. Metaphor in Context. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Van Valin, R. D., Jr., 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578

Vendler, Z., 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Verkuyl, H. J., 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597848

Walton, K. L., 1993. Metaphor and prop oriented make-believe. European Journal of Philosophy 1:39–56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.1993.tb00023.x

Download

Share

COinS