•  
  •  
 

Keywords

Philosophy, linguistics

Abstract

My intention in this paper is to propose a conception of metaphorical meaning on which the meaning of a metaphor includes propositional as well as non-propositional features. I will make two general claims on behalf of the proposed account: first, it is intuitive; second, it is of theoretical value. In claiming that the proposed account is of theoretical value, I mean only that its adoption leads to an increased understanding of the nature of metaphor: of metaphorical thought and ofmetaphorical communication in particular.

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

References

Austin, J. 1962. How to do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.

Black, M. 1954. Models and Metaphor. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Camp, E. 2006. Metaphor and that certain “je ne sais quoi”. Philosophical Studies 129:1–25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-3019-5

Davidson, D. 1978. What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5(1):31–47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/447971

Phelan, M. 2007. The inadequacy of paraphrase is the dogma of metaphor (ms).

Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Share

COinS