Abstract
Here the relationship between understanding and knowledge of meaning is discussed from two different perspectives: that of Dummettian semantic anti-realism and that of the semantic externalism of Putnam and others. The question addressed is whether or not the truth of semantic externalism would undermine a central premise in one of Dummett’s key arguments for anti-realism, insofar as Dummett’s premise involves an assumption about the transparency of meaning and semantic externalism is often taken to undermine such transparency. Several notions of transparency and conveyability of meaning are distinguished and it is argued that, though the Dummettian argument for anti-realism presupposes only a weak connection between knowledge of meaning and understanding, even this much is not trivially true in light of semantic externalism, and that semantic externalism, if true, would thus represent a reason for rejecting the crucial assumption on which the Dummettian argument depends.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Raatikainen, Panu
(2009)
"The Semantic Realism/Anti-Realism Dispute and Knowledge of Meanings,"
Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication:
Vol. 5.
https://doi.org/10.4148/biyclc.v5i0.287
References
Crane, Tim. 2001. Elements of Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Currie, Gregory & Eggenberger, Peter. 1983. ‘Knowledge of Meaning’. Noûs 17: 267–279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215146
Devitt, Michael. 1981. Designation. Columbia University Press, New York.
Devitt, Michael. 1983. ‘Dummett’s Anti-Realism’. Journal of Philosophy 80: 73–99.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2026236
Devitt, Michael. 2010. ‘Hilary and Me: Tracking Down Putnam of the Realism Issue’. In Maria Baghramian (ed.) ‘Permutations: Essays on Hilary Putnam’, Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming).
Dummett, Michael. 1969. ‘The Reality of the Past’. Reprinted in Dummett 1978, 358-374.
Dummett, Michael. 1974. ‘The Social Character of Meaning’. Published in Dummett 1978, 420-430.
Dummett, Michael. 1975. ‘The Philosophical Basis for Intuitionistic Logic’. Reprinted in Dummett 1978, 215-247.
Dummett, Michael. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. Duckworth, London.
Dummett, Michael. 1992. ‘Realism and Anti-Realism’. In Dummett 1993, 462–478.
Dummett, Michael. 1993. The Seas of Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Farkas, Katalin. 2006. ‘Semantic internalism and externalism’. In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.) ‘The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language’, 323–40. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Farkas, Katalin. 2008. The Subject’s Point of View. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230327.001.0001
Gamble, Denise. 2003. ‘Manifestability and semantic realism’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84: 1–23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00159
George, Alexander. 1984. ‘On Devitt on Dummett’. Journal of Philosophy 81: 516–527.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2026270
George, Alexander. 1997. ‘Has Dummett Over-salted His Frege? Remarks on the Conveyability of Thought’. In R. Heck (ed.) ‘Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett’, 35–69. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Green, Karen. 2001. Dummett: Philosophy of Language. Polity, Cambridge.
McGinn, Colin. 1982. ‘The Structure of Content’. In A. Woodfield (ed.) ‘Thought and Content’, 207–258. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Millar, Alan. 1977. ‘Truth and Understanding’. Mind 86: 405–416.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXXVI.343.405
Miller, Alexander. 2003. ‘The Significance of Semantic Realism’. Synthese 136: 191–217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024742007683
Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning”. In Keith Gunderson (ed.) ‘Language, Mind and Knowledge’, 131–193. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, VII, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Reprinted in H. Putnam, (1975c), 215-271.
Putnam, Hilary. 1975b. ‘Language and Reality’. In H. Putnam, (1975c), 272-290.
Putnam, Hilary. 1975c. Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625251
Putnam, Hilary. 1988. Representation and Reality. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Putnam, Hilary. 2007. ‘Between Scylla and Charybdis: Does Dummett Have a Way Out?’ In Auxier & Hahn (ed.) ‘The Philosophy of Michael Dummett’, 155–67. Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago.
Raatikainen, Panu. 2004. ‘Conceptions of Truth in Intuitionism’. History and Philosophy of Logic 25: 131–145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014453401625669
Raatikainen, Panu. 2005. ‘On How to Avoid the Indeterminacy of Translation?’ The Southern Journal of Philosophy 43: 395–414.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01960.x
Shieh, Sanford. 1998a. ‘On the Conceptual Foundations of Anti-Realism’. Synthese 115: 33–70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005020809621
Shieh, Sanford. 1998b. ‘Undecidability in Anti-Realism’. Philosophia Mathematica 6: 324–333.
Wright, Crispin. 1983. Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects. Aberdeen University Press, Scots Philosophical Monographs No. 2.
Wright, Crispin. 1986. Realism, Meaning and Truth. Blackwell, Oxford.