•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Recently, it has been claimed that event semantics does not go well together with quantification, especially if one rejects syntactic, LF-based approaches to quantifier scope. This paper shows that such fears are unfounded, by presenting a simple, variable-free framework which combines a Neo-Davidsonian event semantics with a type-shifting based account of quantifier scope. The main innovation is that the event variable is bound inside the verbal denotation, rather than at sentence level by existential closure. Quantifiers can then be interpreted in situ. The resulting framework combines the strengths of event semantics and type-shifting accounts of quantifiers and thus does not force the semanticist to posit either a default underlying word order or a syntactic LF-style level. It is therefore well suited for applications to languages where word order is free and quantifier scope is determined by surface order. As an additional benefit, the system leads to a straightforward account of negation, which has also been claimed to be problematic for event-based frameworks.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

References

Barker, Chris. 2002. ‘Continuations and the nature of quantification’. Natural Language Semantics 10: 211–242.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022183511876

Barker, Chris & Shan, Chung-chieh. 2008. ‘Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding’. Semantics and Pragmatics 1: 1–46.

Beaver, David & Condoravdi, Cleo. 2007. ‘On the logic of verbal modification’. In Maria Aloni, Paul Dekker & Floris Roelofsen (eds.) ‘Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium’, 3–9. Amsterdam, Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

Beghelli, Filippo & Stowell, Tim. 1997. ‘Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every’. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.) ‘Ways of scope taking’, 71–107. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Brasoveanu, Adrian. 2010. ‘Modified Numerals as Post-Suppositions’. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.) ‘Logic, Language and Meaning’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6042, 203–212. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

Carlson, Gregory N. 1984. ‘Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation’. Linguistics 22: 259–279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1984.22.3.259

Champollion, Lucas. 2010. Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Champollion, Lucas, Tauberer, Josh & Romero, Maribel. 2007. ‘The Penn Lambda Calculator: Pedagogical software for natural language semantics’. In Tracy Holloway King & Emily Bender (eds.) ‘Proceedings of the Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks
(GEAF) 2007 Workshop’, Stanford, CA: CSLI Online Publications.

Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. ‘Punctual until as a scalar NPI’. In Sharon Inkelas & Kristin Hanson (eds.) ‘The nature of the word’, 631–654. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Csirmaz, Aniko. 2006. ‘Aspect, Negation and Quantifiers’. In Liliane Haegeman, Joan Maling, James McCloskey & Katalin E. Kiss (eds.) ‘Event Structure And The Left Periphery’, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 68, 225–253. Springer
Netherlands.

Davidson, Donald. 1967. ‘The logical form of action sentences’. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.) ‘The logic of decision and action’, 81–95. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

de Swart, Henriëtte. 1996. ‘Meaning and use of not . . . until’. Journal of Semantics 13: 221–263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jos/13.3.221

de Swart, Henriëtte & Molendijk, Arie. 1999. ‘Negation and the temporal structure of narrative discourse’. Journal of Semantics 16: 1–42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jos/16.1.1

Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.

Eckardt, Regine. 2010. ‘A Logic for Easy Linking Semantics’. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.) ‘Logic, Language and Meaning’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6042, 274–283. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_28

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2002. ‘UNTIL, aspect and negation: A novel argument for two untils’. In ‘Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT)’, vol. 12, 84–103.

Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1990. ‘Dynamic Montague grammar’. In Lászlo Kálman & Lászlo Polos (eds.) ‘Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language’, Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Hendriks, Herman. 1993. Studied flexibility. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Jacobson, Pauline. 1999. ‘Towards a variable-free semantics’. Linguistics and Philosophy 117–184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005464228727

Krifka, Manfred. 1989. ‘Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics’. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds.) ‘Semantics and contextual expression’, 75–115. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.

Krifka, Manfred. 1998. ‘The origins of telicity’. In Susan Rothstein (ed.) ‘Events and grammar’, 197–235. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Krifka, Manfred. 1999. ‘At Least Some Determiners Aren’t Determiners’. In K. Turner (ed.) ‘The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View’, 257–291. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Landman, Fred. 1996. ‘Plurality’. In Shalom Lappin (ed.) ‘Handbook of Contemporary Semantics’, 425–457. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Landman, Fred. 2000. Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Partee, Barbara H. 1973. ‘Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English’. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 601–609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025024

Partee, Barbara H. 1987. ‘Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles’. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & Martin Stokhof (eds.) ‘Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quanti?ers’, 115–143. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.

Rathert, Monika. 2004. Textures of time. Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag.

Smith, Steven Bradley. 1975. Meaning and negation. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.

von Stechow, Arnim. 2009. ‘Tenses in compositional semantics’. In Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds.) ‘The expression of time’, 129–166. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Winter, Yoad & Zwarts, Joost. 2011. ‘Event semantics and Abstract Categorial Grammar’. In Makoto Kanazawa, Marcus Kracht & Hiroyuki Seki (eds.) ‘Proceedings of Mathematics of Language 12’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Lecture Notes in Arti?cial Intelligence, vol. 6878, 174–191. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.

Zucchi, Sandro & White, Michael. 2001. ‘Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 187–222.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005690022190

Download

Share

COinS