How Do Ideas Become General in their Signification?

Authors

Alexandros Tillas, University of Dusseldorf, Germany

Keywords

abstraction; general ideas; concept individuation; top-down effects in perception; Hebbian learning; classical conditioning

Abstract

Abstraction is one of the central notions in philosophy and cognitive science. Though its origins are often traced to Locke, various senses of abstraction have been developed in fields as diverse as philosophy, psychology, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, and computer science (e.g. Barsalou 2005). The notion of abstraction on which I am focusing here is as that of a process of similarities recognition across instances of a given kind involving progressive exclusion of instance details. As such, abstraction plays a major role in concept-formation and learning. Traditionally, abstraction models have been deemed circular (e.g. Berkeley 1710/1957), while in recent years abstraction models have also come under fire for being incoherent (e.g. Hendriks-Jansen 1996), requiring large conceptual resources in order to operate, and so forth. Here, I flesh out a psychological process on the basis of which general ideas are formed out of representations of particulars. The main characteristics of the suggested view are that abstract representations are structured entities with general representational powers, while a major role is given to top-down effects in perception. I argue that the challenges that both traditional and modern abstraction accounts faced are avoided in the light of the present suggestion.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Tillas, Alexandros (2014) "How Do Ideas Become General in their Signification?," Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication: Vol. 9. https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1091

References

Anderson, S. J., Holiday, I. E., Singh, K. D., & Harding, G. F. A. 1996. “Localization and functional analysis of human cortical area V5 using magneto-encephalography”, Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 263, pp.: 423-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0064

Barsalou, L. W. 1987. “The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts”, in Neisser, Ulric (ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barsalou, L. W. 1999. “Perceptual symbol systems”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:577-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2Fs0140525x99002149

Barsalou, L.W. 2003. “Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 358:1177–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1319

Barsalou, L.W. 2005. “Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems”, in Gershkoff-Stowe, Lisa & Rakison, David H. (eds.), Building object categories:389-431. Carnegie Symposium Series. Majwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bayer, B. 2009. “A Role for Abstractionism in a Direct-Realist Foundationalism”, Synthese 180, 3:357–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9707-5

Berkeley, George. 1710/1957. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653591.008

Biederman, I. 1987. “Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”, Psychological Review 94:115–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1.1.132.8548

Biederman, I. 1990. “Higher-level vision”, in Osherson, Daniel N., Kosslyn, Stephen, & Hollerbach, John M. (eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, vol. 2: Visual cognition and action: 41-72. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bliss, T. V. P. & Gardner-Medwin, A. R. 1973. “Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path”, Journal of Physiology (London) 232:331–56.

Brandt, S. A. & Stark, L. W. 1997. “Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene”, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9:27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.1.27

Cavanaugh, P., Tyler C. W., & Favreau, O.E. 1984. “Perceived velocity of moving chromatic gratings”, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1: 893-9.

Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V. & Martin, A. 1999. “Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects”, Nature Neuroscience 2:913–919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/13217

Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Dobmeyer S, Shulman GL & Petersen S.E. 1990. “Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans”, Science 248:1556-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2360050

Craik, F. I. M., Govoni R., Naveh-Benjamin M. & Anderson N.D. 1996. “The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory”, Journal of Experimental Psychology General 125:159-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159

Damasio, A. R. 1989. “Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition”, Cognition 33:25-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90005-X

Demarais, A. M. & Cohen, B. H. 1998. “Evidence for image-scanning eye movements during transitive inference”, Biological Psychology, 49, 3:229-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(98)00042-8

Desimone, R., Albright, T.D., Gross, C.G., and Bruce, C.J. 1984. “Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque”, Journal of Neuroscience. 4:2051–62.

Devitt, Michael & Sterelny, Kim 1987. Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. MA: MIT Press.

Elman, J. L. & McClelland, J. L. 1985. “An architecture for parallel processing in speech recognition: The TRACE model”, in Schroeder, Marc R. (ed.), Speech recognition: 6-35. Gottingen: Biblioteca Phonetica.

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. 2002. Cognitive Psychology, New York: Psychology Press.

Farah, M. J. 1989. “The neuropsychology of mental imagery”, in Boller, Francois & Grafman, Jordan (eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, vol. 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Farah, M. J. 1995. “Current issues in the neuropsychology of image generation”, Neuropsychologia 33:1455-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00075-E

Findlay, John M. & Gilchrist Iain D. 2003. Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.wno.0000206241.04292.62

Finke, Ronald A. 1989. Principles of Mental Imagery. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Fodor, Jerry. 1981. ‘The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy’, in his RePresentations, Great Britain, The Harvester Press Ltd., (pp.: 257-316).

Fodor, Jerry & Pylyshyn, Zenon. 1988. ‘Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis’. Cognition, 28, pp. 3–71.

Gazzaniga, Mike, S., Ivry, Richard, B. & Mangun, George, R. 1998. Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. Norton.

Goldstone, R. 1994. “Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination”, Journal of Experimental Psychology General 123:178–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.123.2.178

Haselager, P., De Groot, A. & Van Rappard, H. 2003. “Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: a debate for the sake of appearance”, Philosophical Psychology 16, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951508032000067761

Hawken, M. J., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Tang C. 1994. “Contrast dependence of color and luminance motion mechanisms in human vision”, Nature 367: 268-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/367268a0

Hawkins, R. D. 1997. “LTP and learning: Let’s stay together”, Commentary on Shors, T. J. & Matzel, L.D. 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97301599

Hebb, D. O. 1949. The Organization of Behavior. New York: John Wiley.

Hendriks-Jansen, H.1996. Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution and Human Thought, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

Hochberg, Julian. 1999. “Perception as purposeful inquiry: We elect where to direct each glance, and determine what is encoded within and between glances”, Open peer commentary of Barsalou 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99332143

Hume, David. 1739/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243365.001.0001

Hume, David. 1748/1975. “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding”, contained in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, L. A. Selby-Bigge, (ed.) 3^rd edition. Revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Keil, Frank C. 1989. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Kellman, P. J. 1993. “Kinematic foundations of infant visual perception”, in Granrud, Carl E. (ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy:121-­‐73. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Kim, I. J. & Alpert, N. M. 1995. “Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex”, Nature 378:496-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/378496a0

Livingstone M.S. & Hubel D. H. 1987. “Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth”, Journal of Neuroscience, 7:3416-68.

Locke, John. 1690/1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lu, Z., Lesmes L. A., & Sperling G. 1999. “The mechanism of isoluminant chromatic motion perception”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 96: 8289–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.14.8289

Lueck, C. J., Zeki S., Friston K.J., Deiber, M-P., Cope P., Cunningham V.J., Lammertsma A. A., Kennard C., & Frackowiak R. S. J. 1989. “The color center in the cerebral cortex of man”, Nature 340:386-9.

Mandler, J. M. & McDonough, L. 1996. “Drinking and driving don’t mix: Inductive generalization in infancy”, Cognition, 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00696-6

Martinez, C. Do. V., Martinez J. L. & Derrick, B. E. 2002. “Associative long-term potentiation (LTP) among extrinsic afferents of the hippocampal CA3 region in vivo”, Brain Research, 940:86-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02598-2

Mullen, K. T., & Boulton, J. C. 1992a. “Absence of smooth motion perception in color vision”, Vision Research 32: 483-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90240-J

Mullen, K. T., & Boulton, J. C. 1992b. “Interactions between color and luminance contrast in the perception of motion”, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 12:201-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00290.x

Norton, D., & Stark, L.W. 1971. “Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns”, Vision Research, 11:929–942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(71)90213-6

Noudoost B., Chang M. H., Steinmetz N. A. & Moore, T. 2010. “Top-down control of visual attention”, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20:183–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.003

Perry, John. 2001. Possibility, Consciousness and Conceivability, Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, Bradford Books.

Prinz, Jesse. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Prinz, Jesse. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Shors, T. J. & Matzel, L.D. 1997. “Long-term potentiation: What’s learning got to do with it?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences: 20:597-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97001593

Smith, L. B. & Heise, D. 1992. “Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure”, in Burns, Barbara (ed.), Advances in psychology 93 – percepts, concepts, and categories: The representation and processing of information:233-72. Elsevier.

Spelke, E. 1994. “Initial knowledge: Six suggestions”. Cognition, 50: 431-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90039-6

Spelke, E. S. & Van de Walle, G. A. 1993. “Perceiving and reasoning about objects: insights from infants”, in Eilan, Naomi, Brewer, Bill & McCarthy, Rosaleen (eds.), Spatial representation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Spivey, M. J. & Geng, J. J. 2001. “Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects”, Psychological Research, 65, 4:235-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004260100059

Tanaka, K. 1992. “Inferotemporal cortex and higher visual functions”, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2: 502-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-9822(92)90654-S

Tanaka, K. 1996. “Inferotemporal cortex and object vision”, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19: 109-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545

Tillas, Alexandros. 2010. Back to our Senses: An Empiricist on Concept Acquisition. Doctoral Thesis, Bristol University, UK.

Tillas, Alexandros and Trafford, James. (forthcoming 2015). “Communicating Content”. Language & Communication 40: 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.011

Tootell, R. B. H., Reppas, J. B., & Kwong, K. K. 1995. “Functional Analysis of Human MT and Related Visual Cortical Areas Using Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging”, Journal of Neuroscience 15: 3215-30.

Troscianko, T., & Fahle, M. 1988. “Why do isoluminant gratings appear slower?”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 87: 435–69.

Uncapher, M. R., Hutchinson, B. J. & Wagner, A. D. 2011. “Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding”, The Journal of Neuroscience 31, 35:12613-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0152-11.2011

Uzgalis, W. (2012). ‘John Locke’. In In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/). Accessed: Mon Aug 29, 2014.

Zeki, S. 1992. “The visual image in mind and brain”, Scientific American, 267:43-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0992-68

Zeki, S. Watson, J.D., Lueck, C.J. Friston, K. J., Kennard, C. Frankowiak R. S. J. 1991. “A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex”, Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 3: 641-9.