Multimedia Training, Feedlot Employee Training, Dairy Employee Training, Agriculture Working Training in Spanish


Two studies were conducted to determine the effectiveness of digital multimedia modules as training tools for animal care workers. Employees at a commercial feedlot (n = 17) and a commercial dairy (n = 10) were asked to independently complete a 10-question quiz prior to and following viewing of training modules. Module topics in the feedlot were proper handling of non-ambulatory animals and humane methods of euthanasia; modules were administered to the workers, as a group, in either English (n = 7) or Spanish (N = 10), depending on previously indicated worker preference. Modules addressing dairy cattle health practices and dairy cattle handling were presented to the dairy care workers who had a preference for learning in either English (n = 7) or Spanish (n = 3). For feedlot workers, post-test scores were improved by 28% after viewing the modules compared to pre-test scores (74% vs. 58%; P < 0.01), across language and topic. There were no interactions (P > 0.30) between language, topic, and between-test variation, indicating that the modules were equally effective at information delivery to both audiences in both languages. For the dairy workers, test scores improved by 27% from pre-viewing to post-viewing (73% vs. 92%; P < 0.01); there was an interaction between the effect of module and language preference (P < 0.01) indicating that although scores increased for both of the topic areas for the English-speaking workers, only the score for the animal health topic increased for the Spanish-speaking workers. Regardless of nationality, level of formal education, topic, or preferred language, digital media are effective at improving knowledge transfer to animal care professionals.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


1. Rosson, P., F. Adcock, D. Susanto, and D. Anderson. 2009. The economic impacts of immigration on U.S. dairy farms. National Milk Producers Federation and USDA CSREES, Federal Research Administration Grant #2008-03223 / Center for North American Studies. http://www.nmpf.org/files/file/NMPF%20Immigration%20Survey%20Web.pdf Accessed 06/10/2010.

2. Harrison, J., S. Lloyd, and T. O’Kane. 2009. “Overview of Immigrant Workers on Wisconsin Dairy Farms.” Changing hands: Hired labor on Wisconsin dairy farms. Program on Agricultural Technology Studies. University of Wisconsin. http://www.pats.wisc.edu. Accessed 06/10/2010.

3. Kochhar, R. 2005. Survey of Mexican Migrants, Part Three: The Economic Transition to America. Pew Hispanic Center. A Pew Research Center Project. http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/58.pdf Accessed 06/10/2010.

4. Burns, K. 2008. “A meeting of minds on the welfare of beef cattle: Kansas State University's Beef Cattle Institute hosts International Symposium.” July 15, 2008. JAVMA, Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/jul08/080715a.asp. Accessed 06/10/2010.

5. Cima, G. 2009. “Experts give views on antimicrobial use, resistance: Conference at Kansas State examines antimicrobial use in cattle production.” August 1, 2009, JAVMA News. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/aug09/090801r.asp Accessed 06/10/2010.

6. Pew Research Center. 2010. Pew Internet & American Life Project. The Pew Charitable Trusts. http://pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Online-Activites-Total.aspx. accessed 06/07/2010.

7. Felder, R.M., and E.R. Henriques. 1995. "Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education," Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21-31. Application of the F-S learning style model to language education.

8. Griggs, S., and R. Dunn. 1996. Hispanic-American Students and Learning Style. The Clearinghouse on Early Education and Parenting, Children’s Research Center, University of Illinois Urbana -Champaign. EDO-PS-96-4.

9. Felder, R.M. 1996. “Matters of Style,” ASEE Prism, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 18–23. www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/LSPrism.htm. Accessed 06/07/2010.