classifier, numeral, semantic parameter, Japanese
In obligatory classifier languages like Japanese, numerals cannot directly modify nouns without the help of a classifier. It is standardly considered that this is because nouns in obligatory classifier languages have ‘uncountable denotations’, unlike in non-classifier languages like English, and the function of classifiers is to turn such uncountable denotations into something countable (Chierchia 1998a,b, Krifka 2008, among many others). Contrary to this view, it is argued that what makes Japanese an obligatory classifier language is not the semantics of nouns but the semantics of numerals. Specifically, evidence is presented that numerals in Japanese cannot function as predicates on their own, which is taken as evidence that the extensions of numerals in Japanese are exclusively singular terms. It is then proposed that the semantic function of classifiers is to turn such singular terms into modifiers/predicates. It is furthermore claimed that the singular terms denoted by numerals are abstract entities (cf. Rothstein 2013, Scontras 2014a,b), and proposed that the reason why they cannot have modifier/predicate uses in obligatory classifier languages like Japanese is because the presence of classifiers in the lexicon blocks the use of a type-shifting operator that turns singular terms denoted by numerals into predicates (cf. Chierchia 1998a,b).
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
"The Semantic Role of Classifiers in Japanese,"
Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication:
Bale, Alan & Barner, David. 2009. ‘The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction’. Journal of Semantics 26, no. 3: 217–252.
Bale, Alan & Coon, Jessica. 2014. ‘Classifiers are for numerals, not nouns: Consequences for the mass-count distinction’. Linguistic Inquiry 45, no. 4: 695–705.
Bale, Alan & Khanjian, Hrayr. 2008. ‘Classifiers and number marking’. In ‘Proceedings of SALT 18’, 73–89.
——. 2014. ‘Syntactic complexity and competition: The singular-plural distinction in Western-Armenian’. Linguistic Inquiry 45, no. 1: 1–26.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bunt, Harry Cornelius. 1985. Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. ‘Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP’. Linguistic Inquiry 30, no. 4: 509–542.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1985. ‘Formal semantics and the grammar of predication’. Linguistic Inquiry 16, no. 3: 417–443.
——. 1998a. ‘Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ’semantic parameter”. In S. Rothstein (ed.) ‘Events and Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer’, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
——. 1998b. ‘Reference to kinds across languages’. Natural Language Semantics 6, no. 4: 339–405.
——. 2010. ‘Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation’. Synthese 174, no. 1: 99– 149.
Chierchia, Gennaro & Turner, Raymond. 1988. ‘Semantics and property theory’. Linguistics and Philosophy 11, no. 3: 261–302.
Doetjes, Jenny. 2012. ‘Count/mass distinctions across languages’. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.) ‘Semantics: An International Handbook of Meaning, vol. 3’, 2559–2580. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fukui, Naoki & Takano, Yuji. 2000. ‘Nominal structure: An extension of the symmetry principle’. In Peter Svenonius (ed.) ‘The Derivation of VO and OV’, 219–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ionin, Tania & Matushansky, Ora. 2006. ‘The composition of complex cardinals’. Journal of Semantics 23, no. 4: 315–360.
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. ‘Common nouns: a contrastive analysis of English and Chinese’. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.) ‘The Generic Book’, 398–411. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
——. 2008. ‘Different kinds of count nouns and plurals’. Talk given at the Syntax in the World’s Languages III.
Li, XuPing. 2011. On the Semantics of Classifiers in Chinese. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University dissertation, http://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/.
McCready, Eric. 2009. ‘Conventional implicature and classifiers’. Journal of Cognitive Science 10, no. 2: 195–208.
Nemoto, Naoko. 2005. ‘On mass denotations of bare nouns in Japanese and Korean’. Linguistics 43, no. 2: 383–413.
Rothstein, Susan. 2010. ‘Counting and the mass-count distinction’. Journal of Semantics 27.
——. 2013. ‘A Fregean semantics for number words’. In ‘Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium’.
Scontras, Gregory. 2013. ‘Accounting for counting: A unified semantics for measure terms and classifiers’. In ‘Proceedings of SALT 23’, 549–569.
——. 2014a. ‘Amount semantics’. In ‘Proceedings of SALT 24’, 310–329. ——. 2014b. The Semantics of Measurement. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
Solt, Stefanie. 2015. ‘Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity’. Journal of Semantics 15: 221–273.
Sudo. to appear. ‘Countable nouns in Japanese’.
Watanabe, Akira. 2006. ‘Functional projections of nominal in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24, no. 1: 241–306.