Bare Nouns in Brazilian Portuguese: An experimental study on grinding

Authors

Kayron Beviláqua, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil
Suzi Lima, University of Toronto, Canada/ Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Roberta Pires de Oliveira, CNPQ/Federal University of Paraná, Brazil

Keywords

bare nouns, Brazilian Portuguese, Coercion, Mass/Count, Universal Grinder

Abstract

Much literature has explored the interpretation of the bare singular (BS) in Brazilian Portuguese. Pires de Oliveira and Rothstein (2011) claim that BS nouns are mass because they denote kinds and argue that this explains why only the BS in Brazilian Portuguese can have a non-cardinal interpretation. In this paper, based on an experimental task with Brazilian Portuguese adult speakers, we explore one of their predictions, namely that the ‘volume interpretation’ of the BS cannot be explained as a case of Grinding. Our results show that Grinding and Volume readings of a BS noun are not equivalent (in favor of their hypothesis). We also show that a volume interpretation of a noun is never preferred when a cardinal interpretation is available, but that this can be explained by other lexical and pragmatic factors. We conclude by suggesting that Rothstein’s (in press) distinction between counting and measuring accounts for the fact that non-cardinal readings are not grinding.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Beviláqua, Kayron; Lima, Suzi; and Pires de Oliveira, Roberta (2016) "Bare Nouns in Brazilian Portuguese: An experimental study on grinding," Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication: Vol. 11. https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1113

References

Bale, Alan & Barner, David. 2009. ‘The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction’. Journal of Semantics 26, no. 3: 217–252.

Barner, David & Snedeker, Jesse. 2005. ‘Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count’. Cognition 97: 41–66.

Beviláqua, K. C. 2015. ‘Sintagmas Nominais nus: Um experimento sobre a distinção contável-massivo no PB’. Masters thesis, Universidade Federal do Paraná.

Beviláqua, K. C. & Pires De Oliveira, R. 2014. ‘Brazilian bare phrases and referentiality: Evidences from an experimente’. Revista Letras, Curitiba 90: 253–275.

Bunt, H. 1985. Mass Terms and Model Theoretic Semantics. Cambridge UP, Cambridge. Originally a University of Amsterdam PhD Dissertation, 1981.

Cheng, Lisa L.S., Doetjes, Jenny & Sybesma, Rint. 2008. ‘How universal is the Universal Grinder?’ In Marjo van Koppen & Bert Botma (eds.) ‘Linguistics in the Netherlands’, 50–62. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2010. ‘Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation’. Synthese 174, no. 1: 99–149.

Dobrovie-Sorin, C. & Pires De Oliviera, R. 2010. ‘Generic BS in Brazilian Portuguese’. In C. Arregi, Z. Fagyal, S.A. Montrul & A. Tremblay (eds.) ‘Romance Linguistics 2008’, John Benjamins.

Dobrovie-Sorin, C., Bleam, T. & Espinal, M. T. 2006. ‘Bare nouns, numbers and types of incorporation’. In S. Vogeller & L. Tasmowski (eds.) ‘Non-Definiteness and Plurality’, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Doetjes, Jenny. 1997. Quantifiers and Selection. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden.

Frisson, Steven & Frazier, Lyn. 2005. ‘Carving up word meaning: Portioning and grinding’. Journal of Memory and Language 53: 277–91.

Gleason, H. A. 1965. Linguistics and English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Gomes, A. & Lima, S. 2015. ‘BS mass nouns can be interpreted as count nouns in BP’. Third ANPOLL International Psycholinguistics Congress, UFRJ/PUC-Rio, Brazil, March 2015.

Grimm, S. & Levin, B. 2012. ‘Who Has More Furniture? An Exploration of the Bases for Comparison’. Mass/Count in Linguistics, Philosophy and Cognitive Science Conference, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France, December 20-21.

Landman, Fred. 2011. ‘Count nouns – mass nouns – neat nouns – mess nouns’. Formal Semantics and Pragmatics: Discourse, Context and Models. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6.

Li, P., Ogura, T., Barner, D., Yang, S-J. & Carey, S. 2009. ‘Does the conceptual distinction between singular and plural sets depend on language?’ Developmental Psychology 45, no. 6: 1644–1657.

Lima, S. & Gomes, A. 2016. ‘The interpretation of Brazilian Portuguese bare singulars in neutral contexts’. Revista Letras.

Lima, Suzi. 2014. The Grammar of Individuation and Counting. Ph.D. thesis, UMass Amherst.

Link, Godehard. 1983. ‘The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach’. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwartze & A. von Stechow (eds.) ‘Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language’, 302–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Muller, A.2002. ‘The Semantics of Generic Quantification in Brazilian Portuguese’. Probus 14: 279–298.

Paraguassu, N. 2010. ‘A contabilidade dos nomes no português brasileiro’. Tese de Doutorado. São Paulo, USP, 2010.

Pelletier, Francis J. 1975. ‘Non-singular reference: Some preliminaries’. Philosophia 451– 65.

Pelletier, Francis J. & Schubert, Lenhart K. 1989. ‘Mass expressions’. In Dov Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.) ‘Handbook of philosophical logic, 2nd edition, Vol. 10’, 249– 335. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003. Updated version of the 1989 version in the 1st edition of Handbook of Philosophical Logic.

Pelletier, Francis J. (ed.). 1979. Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems. Reidel, Dordrecht.

Pires De Oliveira, R. & De Swart, H. 2015. ‘Brazilian Portuguese noun phrases: An optimality theoretic perspective’. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 14, no. 1: 63–93.

Pires De Oliveira, R. & Mendes De Souza, L. 2013. ‘O singular nu e a comparação: uma proposta de derivação semântica’. Revista LinguíStica / Revista do Programa de PósGraduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Vol. 9, n. 1.

Pires de Oliveira, R. & Rothstein, S. 2011. ‘Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portugese’. Lingua 121: 2153–2175.

Rothstein, S. 2012. ‘Numbers: Counting, Measuring and Classifying’. In Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds.) ‘Proceedings of Sinn und Be- deutung 16’, 527–543. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Cambridge, MA.

Rothstein, Susan. 2009. ‘Measuring and counting in Modern Hebrew’. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 106–145.

——. 2010. ‘Counting and the mass-count distinction’. Journal of Semantics 27.

——. in press. Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge University Press.

Samuelson, Larissa K. & Smith, Linda B. 1999. ‘Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond?’ Cognition 73: 1–33.

Schmitt, C. & Munn, A. 1999. ‘Against the nominal mapping parameter: Bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese’. Proceedings NELS 29: 339–353.

Schwarzschild, Roger. 2011. ‘Stubborn Distributivity, Multiparticipant Nouns and the Count/Mass Distinction’. In ‘Proceedings of NELS 29’, 661–678. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

Wiese, Heike & Maling, Joan. 2005. ‘Beers, kaffi, and schnapps – different grammatical options for ‘restaurant talk’ coercions in three germanic languages’. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17: 1–38.