Crime Investigations: The Countability Profile of a Delinquent Noun

Authors

Scott Grimm, University of Rochester, USA

Keywords

countability, nouns, non-countable nouns, countable nouns

Abstract

This paper aims to broaden our understanding of countability beyond what is found with concrete nouns, providing a one-word case study of the countable and non-countable uses of the noun crime. I show that the behavior of crime runs counter to a variety of expectations inherited from the literature on countability: its countable use cannot be directly grounded in atomic acts or events, nor is its non- countable use simply equivalent to a plural individual composed of individual crimes, as one might expect on analogy with certain analyses of furniture. Additionally, while crime has a use as a bare plural, that use does not refer to a kind. A quantitative study supports these conclusions. Altogether, crime demonstrates a novel noun type with respect to its nominal semantics and countability behavior, which is also an indication of the large empirical terrain that awaits exploration for eventive and abstract nouns.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Grimm, Scott (2016) "Crime Investigations: The Countability Profile of a Delinquent Noun," Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication: Vol. 11. https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1111

References

Bale, Alan & Barner, David. 2009. ‘The Interpretation of Functional Heads: Using Comparatives to Explore the Mass/Count Distinction’. Journal of Semantics 26: 217–252.

Barner, David & Snedeker, Jesse. 2005. ‘Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count’. Cognition 97: 41–66.

Behrens, Leila. 1995. ‘Categorizing between lexicon and grammar: The MASS/COUNT distinction in a cross-linguistic perspective’. Lexicology 1: 1–112.

Chemerinsky, Jeffrey M. 2009. ‘Counting Offenses’. Duke Law Journal 709–746.

Cheng, Chung-Ying. 1973. ‘Comments on Moravcsik’s paper’. In Jaakko Hintikka, Patrick Suppes&J.M.E.Moravcsik(eds.)‘Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics’, 215–220. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998a. ‘Reference to kinds across languages’. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405.

——. 1998b. ‘Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter”’. In Susan Rothstein (ed.) ‘Events and Grammar’, 53–104. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A. 2004. Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Crain, Hillary Jerrol. 1959. ‘Criminal Law - Prosecution for Two Crimes Resulting from a Single Criminal Act’. Louisiana Law Review 19: 868–872.

Davies, Mark. 2008. ‘The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990 present’. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.

de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, MacCartney, Bill & Manning, Christopher D. 2006. ‘Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Trees’. In ‘LREC’, .

Deal, Amy Rose. To appear. ‘Countability distinctions and semantic variation’. Natural Language Semantics .

Farkas, Donka & Swart, Henriëtte de. 2003. The semantics of incorporation: From argument structure to discourse transparency. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Glasbey, Sheila.1994. ‘Bare Plurals in Object Position: Which Verbs Fail to Give Existential Readings, and Why?’ In Liliane Tasmowski & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds.) ‘Indefiniteness and Plurality’, Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Grimm, Scott. 2012. Number and Individuation. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University. ——. 2014. ‘Individuating the Abstract’. In Urtzi Etxeberria, Anamaria Falaus, Aritz Irurtzun & Bryan Leferman (eds.) ‘Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18’, 182–200. Bayonne and Vitoria-Gasteiz.

Higginbotham, James. 1983. ‘The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics’. Journal of Philosophy 80, no. 2: 100–127.

Krifka, M., Pelletier, F., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G. & Link, G. 1995. ‘Genericity: An Introduction’. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.) ‘The Generic Book’, 1–125. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Landman, Fred. 2016. ‘Iceberg Semantics for Count Nouns and Mass Nouns: Classifiers, Measures and Portions’. In Jurgis Skilters & Susan Rothstein (eds.) ‘Proceedings of 11th International Symposium of Cognition, Logic and Communication’.

Link, Godehard. 1983. ‘The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice- theoretical approach’. In Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.) ‘Meaning, use, and interpretation of language’, Berlin: de Gruyter.

Maienborn, Claudia.2011. ‘Event Semantics’. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.) ‘Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning’, HSK Handbook series, vol. 1. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

McNally, Louise. 1997. A Semantics for the English Existential Construction. New York: Garland Press.

Oxford English Dictionary. 2012. Oxford University Press. Online Edition.

Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rothstein, Susan. 2010. ‘Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction’. Journal of Semantics 27: 343–397.

Schwarzschild, Roger. 2006. ‘The Role of Dimensions in the Syntax of Noun Phrases’. Syntax 7, no. 2: 32–75.

——. 2011. ‘Stubborn Distributivity, Multiparticipant Nouns and the Count/Mass Dis- tinction’. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.) ‘Proceedings of the 39th meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 39)’, vol. 2, 661–678. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

Scontras, Gregory & Goodman, Noah D. 2015. ‘Interpreting collective predication’. Talk presented at Workshop on Experimental Approaches to Semantics (ExAS), ESSLLI 2015.

Strawson, Peter F. 1954. ‘Particular and General’. In ‘Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society’, vol. 54, 233–260.