counting, measuring, linguistics, syntactic interpretation, semantic interpretation
In this paper, I show that expressions like two glasses of wine are ambiguous between counting and measuring interpretations, and that each interpretation is associated with a different semantic representation. In each interpretation, glasses has a different function. In the counting interpretation, glasses is a relational noun, while in the measure interpretation, glasses is a measure head analogous to litre. This difference leads to a number of grammatical contrasts which can be explained by differences in the grammatical structure. I discuss whether these differences are only semantic or also expressed in the syntactic representation. The assumption that syntax directly reflects semantic interpretation leads to assigning counting NPs and measuring NPs two different syntactic structures: counting NPs are right-branching with two modifying glasses of wine, while in measure expressions the numeral and the measure head form a measure predicate two glasses which modifies the N. I show that in Modern Hebrew and Mandarin counting structures and measuring structures clearly do have different syntactic structures, reflecting the semantic differences between counting and measuring. While the evidence in the case of English is less strong, the assumption that syntax directly reflects compositional syntactic structure results in the same basic syntactic contrasts in English as well.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
"Counting and Measuring: a theoretical and crosslinguistic account,"
Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication:
Borer, Hagit. 1989. ‘On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs’. In et. al G. Booij (ed.) ‘Morphology Yearbook 1’, 45–64. Dordrecht: Foris.
——. 1999. ‘Deconstructing the construct’. In K. Johnson & I. Roberts (eds.) ‘Beyond Principles and Parameters’, 43–90. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
——. 2009. ‘Compounds: the view from Hebrew’. In R. Lieber & P. Stekauer (eds.) ‘The Oxford Handbook of Compounding’, 491–511. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carlson, Greg N. 1977. ‘Amount relatives’. Language 3, no. 53: 520–542.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Rint, Sybesma. 1998. ‘Yi-wan Tang, yi-ge Tang: classifiers and massifiers’. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 28, no. 3: 385–412.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. ‘Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ’semantic parameter”. In S. Rothstein (ed.) ‘Events and Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer’, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chierchia, Gennaro & Turner, Ray. 1987. ‘Semantics and property theory’. Linguistics and Philosophy 11.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
Doetjes, Jenny. 1997. Quantifiers and Selection. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden.
Doron, Edit & Meir, Irit. 2013. ‘Construct state: Modern Hebrew’. In G. Khan (ed.) ‘The Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics’, 581–589. Leiden: Brill.
Gawron, Jean M. 2002. ‘Two kinds of quantizers in DP’. Paper presented at the 2002 LSA Annual Meeting, January 6.
Gil, David. 2013. ‘Numeral Classifiers’. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) ‘The World Atlas of Language Structures Online’, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/55, Accessed on 2015-03-31.).
Grestenberger, Laura. 2015. ‘Number marking in German measure phrases and the structure of pseudo-partitives’. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18, no. 2: 93–138.
Grosu, Alexander & Landman, Fred. 1998. ‘Strange relatives of the third kind’. Natural Language Semantics 6, no. 2: 125–170.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite NPs. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
——. 1987. ‘Where does the definiteness restriction apply?’ In ‘In The Representation of (In) definiteness’, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Kamp, Hans. 1981. ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation’. In: J. Groenendijk, Th. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Volume 1. pp. 77–322. Amsterdam: Mathematic Centre. Reprinted in: P. Portner and B.H. Partee (eds.), 2002. Formal Semantics. pp. 189–222. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. And reprinted in: K. von Heusinger. and A. ter Meulen (eds.), 2013. The Dynamics of Meaning and Interpretation. Selected Papers of Hans Kamp. pp. 329–369. Leiden: Brill.
Khrizman, Keren, Landman, Fred, Lima, Suzi, Rothstein, Susan & Schvarcz, Brigitta R. 2015. ‘Portion readings are count readings, not measure readings’. In: Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium.
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. ‘Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics’. In R. Bartsch, J. van Bentham & Peter van Emde Boas (eds.) ‘Semantics and Contextual Expressions’, 75–155. Dordrecht: Foris.
——. 1995. ‘Common nouns: a contrastive analysis of English and Chinese’. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.) ‘The Generic Book’, 398–411. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Landman, Fred. 2003. ‘Predicate-argument mismatches and the adjectival theory of indefinites’. In M. Coene & Y. d’Hulst (eds.) ‘From NP to DP Volume 1: The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Phrases’, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
——. 2004. Indefinites and the Type of Sets. Oxford: Blackwell.
——. 2015. ‘Lectures on Iceberg Semantics for Mass and Count Nouns’.
——. 2016. ‘Iceberg Semantics for Mass Nouns and Count Nouns’. This volume, Ms Tel-Aviv University/Tübingen University.
Li, XuPing. 2011. On the Semantics of Classifiers in Chinese. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University dissertation, http://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/.
——. 2013. Numeral classifiers in Chinese: the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Li, Xuping & Rothstein, Susan. 2012. ‘Measure readings of Mandarin classifier phrases and the particle de’. Language and Linguistics 13, no. 4: 693–741.
Link, Godehard. 1983. ‘The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice- theoretical approach’. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwartze & A. von Stechow (eds.) ‘Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language’, 302–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
artee, Barbara & Borschev, Vladimir. 2004. ‘The semantics of Russian Genitive of Negation: The nature and role of perspectival structure’. In R. B. Young (ed.) ‘Proceedings of SALT XIV 212-234’, 212–234. Ithaca: CLC Publications.
——. 2012. ‘Sortal, relational, and functional interpretations of nouns and Russian container constructions’. Journal of Semantics 29, no. 4: 445–486.
Partee, Barbara H. 2008. ‘Negation, intensionality, and aspect: Interaction with NP semantics’. In S. Rothstein (ed.) ‘Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect’, 291–317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Paul, Waltraud. 2016. ‘The insubordinate subordinator ‘de’ in Mandarin Chinese’. To appear in: S-W. Tang (ed.) ‘The Attributive Particle in Chinese’, Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics Series: Beijing: Peking University Press.
Ritter, Elizabeth.1988. ‘A head movement approach to construct state phrases’. Linguistics 26: 909–929.
Rothstein, Susan. 2009. ‘Measuring and counting in Modern Hebrew’. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 106–145.
——.2011. ‘Counting, measuring and the semantics of classifiers’. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6. http://newprairiepress.org/biyclc/ vol6/iss1/15.
——. 2013. Adjectivally-headed construct states in Hebrew. Lingua, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.005.
——. in press. Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge University Press.
Schvarcz, Brigitta. 2014. ‘The Hungarians who say -nyi: Issues in numbers, counting and measuring in Hungarian’. MA thesis Bar-Ilan University.
Schwarzschild, Roger. 2006. ‘The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases’. Syntax 9, no. 1: 67–110.