philosophy, analytic philosophy, history of philosophy


In 1956, a series of BBC radio talks was published in London under the title The Revolution in Philosophy (Ayer et al. 1956). This short book included papers by prominent British philosophers of the day, such as Sir Alfred Ayer and Sir Peter Strawson, with an introduction by Gilbert Ryle. Although there is precious little in it concerning the precise nature of the ‘revolution’ alluded to in the title, it is quite clear that these lectures were meant to celebrate in an insular manner the birth of ‘analytic philosophy’ at the hands of Moore, Russell, and Wittgenstein. The use of the word ‘revolution’ to describe the birth of ‘analytical philosophy’ and its rise to near complete dominance in the British universities thus carries with it connotations of a forcible substitution of one philosophical order by a new one that itself owed nothing to the past. To me, however, this talk of ‘revolution’ carries with it a false view of the history of British philosophy: it isn’t ‘historical’ at all, just ideological; it was introduced for a strategic purpose, namely that of encouraging new generations of students to avoid reading the work of earlier philosophers or becoming interested in the problems that concerned them. I shall sketch the broad outlines of a landscape that involves, when limited to the specific topic of the theory of knowledge, no radical break, where no entirely new order replaces an older one: the options, so to speak, and even some of the arguments are the same before and after the soi-disant ‘revolution’.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.


Allard, J. 2005. The Logical Foundations of Bradley’s Metaphysics. Judgement, Inference and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Austin, J. L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ayer, Sir A. J. 1940. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: MacMillan.

Ayer, Sir A. J. 1972. Russell. London: Fontana.

Ayer, Sir A. J., Kneale, W. C., Paul, G. A., Pears, D. F., Strawson, P. F., Warnock, G. J. & Wollheim, R. A. 1956. The Revolution in Philosophy. London: MacMillan.

Bain, A. [1855] 1864. The Senses and the Intellect. 2nd ed. London: Longmans & Green.

Bain, A. [1859] 1865. The Emotions and the Will. 2nd ed. London: Longmans & Green.

Bell, D. 1999. ‘The Revolution of Moore and Russell: A Very British Coup?’ In A. O’Hear (ed.) ‘German Philosophy since Kant’, 137–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bird, G. 1962. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bradley, F. H. 1914. Essays on Truth and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bradley, F. H. [1876] 1927. Ethical Studies. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bradley, F. H. [1883] 1928. The Principles of Logic. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press. Corrected impression.

Bradley, F. H. [1893] 1930. Appearance and Reality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ninth impression.

Collingwood, R. G. 1924. ‘Sensation and Thought’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 24: 55–76.

Collingwood, R. G. 2005. An Essay on Philosophical Method. rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cook Wilson, J. [1926] 2002. Statement and Inference. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprint: Bristol, Thoemmes.

Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origins of Species by means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favourite Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.

D’Oro, G. 2002. Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience. London: Routledge.

Gabriel, G. 1986. ‘Frege als Neukantianer’. Kant-Studien 77: 84–101.

Gewirth, A. 1957. ‘Review of The Revolution in Philosophy by A. J. Ayer, W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, R. A. Wollheim’. Ethics 67: 146–148.

Green, T. H. 1883. Prolegomena to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Green, T. H. [1874] 1885. ‘Introduction to Hume’s “Treatise on Human Nature”’. In R. L. Nettleship (ed.) ‘The Works of Thomas Hill Green’, vol. 1, 1–371.

Hamilton, A. 1998. ‘Mill, Phenomenalism and the Self’. In J. Skorupski (ed.) ‘The Cambridge Companion to Mill’, 139–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hamilton, Sir W. 1866. Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic. Boston: Gould & Lincoln.

Hauser, K. 2003. ‘Lotze and Husserl’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85: 152–178.

Husserl, E. 1931. Ideas. General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Künne, W. 1991. ‘The Nature of Acts: Moore on Husserl’. In D. Bell & N. Cooper (eds.) ‘The Analytic Tradition’, 104–116. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kusch, M. 1995. Psychologism. A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London: Routledge.

Lapointe, S. 2008. Qu’est-ce que l’analyse? Paris: Vrin.

Lapointe, S. forthcoming. Bernard Bolzano’s Theoretical Philosophy. An Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Lotze, R. H. 1884. Logic in Three Books of Thought, of Investigation, and of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mach, E. 1959. The Analysis of Sensations. New York: Dover.

Mander, W. J. 1994. An Introduction to Bradley’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mander, W. J. 2000. ‘Bosanquet and the Concrete Universal’. The Modern Schoolman 77: 293–308.

Mansel, H. L. 1859. The Limits of Religious Thought. Boston: Gould & Lincoln.

Mansel, H. L. [1851] 1860. Prolegomena Logica: An Inquiry into the Psychological Character of Logical Processes. 2nd ed. Boston: Gould & Lincoln.

Mansel, H. L. 1866. The Philosophy of the Conditioned. London: Alexander Strahan.

Marion, M. 2000. ‘Oxford Realism: Knowledge and Perception’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8: 299–338 & 485–519.

Marion, M. [1926] 2002. ‘Introduction’. In (Cook Wilson 2002), v–xxvii. Reprint: Bristol, Thoemmes.

Marion, M. 2003. ‘Husserl et le réalisme britannique’. In D. Fisette & S. Lapointe (ed.) ‘Aux origines de la phénoménologie. Husserl et le contexte des Recherches Logiques’, 255–286. Québec/Paris: Presses de l’Université de Laval/Vrin.

Marion, M. 2009a. ‘L’épistémologie de Russell: de la logique mathématique aux vertus épistémiques’. In R. Nadeau (ed.) ‘Philosophies de la connaissance. Contributions à une histoire de la théorie de la connaissance’, 281–316. Québec/Paris: Presses de l’Université de Laval/Vrin.

Marion, M. 2009b. ‘L’anti-psychologisme de Bradley: idéalité de la signification, jugement et universaux’. Philosophiques, 36, n. 1: 53-81.

Mill, J. S. [1843] 1973. ‘A System of Logic’. In ‘Collected Works’, vol. VII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Mill, J. S. 1978. ‘Essays on Philosophy and the Classics’. In ‘Collected Works’, vol. XI. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Mill, J. S. [1865] 1979. ‘An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy’. In ‘Collected Works’, vol. IX. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Moore, G. E. 1910a. ‘The Subject-Matter of Psychology’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 10: 36–62.

Moore, G. E. 1910b. ‘Critical Notice: Empfindung und Denken von Dr. August Messer’. Mind 19: 395–409.

Moore, G. E. 1953. Some Main Problems of Philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.

Pears, D. F. 1967. Bertrand Russell and the British Tradition in Philosophy. London: Collins.

Prichard, H. A. 1906. ‘Appearances and Reality’. Mind 15: 223–229.

Prichard, H. A. 1909. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Reid, T. [1785] 1969. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

Russell, B. 1900. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. London, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Russell, B. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin.

Russell, B. 1905. ‘On Denoting’. Mind 14, no. 56: 479–493.

Russell, B. 1927. An Outline of Philosophy. New York: W. Norton.

Russell, B. 1984. ‘Theory of Knowledge. The 1913 Manuscript’. In ‘The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell’, vol. 7. London: Allen & Unwin.

Russell, B. [1911] 1992. ‘Analytic Realism’. In ‘The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell’, vol. 6, 409–32. London: Routledge.

Ryan, A. [1865] 1979. ‘Introduction’. In (Mill 1979), vii–lxii.

Ryle, G. 1956. ‘Introduction’. In (Ayer et al. 1956), 1–11.

Sellars, W. 1975. ‘Autobiographical Reflections’. In H.-N. Castaneda (ed.) ‘Action, Knowledge and Reality. Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars’, 276–293. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Sellars, W. 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Skinner, Q. 2001. ‘The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to the History of Political Thought’. In D. Castiglione & I. Hampsher-Monk (eds.) ‘The History of Political Thought in National Context’, 175–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spencer, H. [1865] 1868. ‘Mill versus Hamilton – The Test of Truth’. In ‘Essays: Scientific, Political and Speculative’, vol. II, 383–413. London: Williams & Norgate.

Spencer, H. [1862] 1886. First Principles. 4th ed. New York: Appleton & Co.

Stern, R. 2007. ‘Hegel, British Idealism and the Curious Case of the Concrete Universal’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15: 115–153.

Stock, G. 1998. ‘Introduction: The Realistic Spirit in Bradley’s Philosophy’. In G. Stock (ed.) ‘Appearance Versus Reality: New Essays on Bradley’s Metaphysics’, 1–18. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stout, G. F. 1896. Analytic Psychology. London: Allen & Unwin. 2 vols.

Stout, G. F. 1911. Some Fundamental Points in the Theory of Knowledge. Glasgow: Maclehose.

Taylor, A. E. 1904. Elements of Metaphysics. London: Methuen. van der Schaar, M. S. 1996. ‘From Analytic Psychology to Analytic Philosophy: The Reception of Twardowski’s Ideas in Cambridge’. Axiomathes 3: 293–324.

Ward, J. 1918. Psychological Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williamson, T. 2004. ‘Philosophical ‘Intuitions’ and Scepticism about Judgement’. Dialectica 58: 109–153.

Wollheim, R. 1956. ‘F. H. Bradley’. In (Ayer et al. 1956), 12–25.

Wollheim, R. 1959. F. H. Bradley. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.