This paper motivates two bases for ascribing propositional semantic knowledge (or something knowledge-like): first, because it's necessary to rationalize linguistic action; and, second, because it's part of an empirical theory that would explain various aspects of linguistic behavior. The semantic knowledge ascribed on these two bases seems to differ in content, epistemic status, and cognitive role. This raises the question: how are they related, if at all? The bulk of the paper addresses this question. It distinguishes a variety of answers and their varying philosophical and empirical commitments.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.


Asher, N. & Morreau, M. 1995. ‘What Some Generic Sentences Mean’. In G. Carslon & J. Pelletier (eds.) ‘The Generic Book’, 300–38. Chicago.

Aydede, M. 1998. ‘Fodor on Concepts and Frege Puzzles’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 289–94.

Bach, K. 1997. ‘Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs?’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 215–41.

Bialystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in Development. Cambridge.

Block, N. 1990. ‘Consciousness and Accessibility’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 596–7.

Brown, J. 2003. ‘Externalism and the Fregean Tradition’. In A. Barber (ed.) ‘Epistemology of Language’, 431–55. Oxford.

Burgess, J. & Rosen, G. 1997. A Subject With No Object. Oxford.

Carlson, G. & Pelletier, J. (eds.). 1995. The Generic Book. Chicago.

Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. 1995. Meaning and Grammar. Second ed. MIT.

Chomsky, N. 1968/72. Language and Mind. enlarged edition (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).

Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on Language. Pantheon.

Chomsky, N. 2003. ‘Reply to Rey’. In L. Antony & N. Hornstein (eds.) ‘Chomsky and his Critics’, 274–87. Blackwell.

Clark, E. 1978. ‘Awareness of Language: Some Evidence from what Children Say and Do’. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella & W. Levelt (eds.) ‘The Child’s Conception of Language’, 17–43. Springer.

Clark, H. & Fox Tree, J. 2002. ‘Using Uh and Um in Spontaneous Speaking’. Cognition 84: 73–111.

Collins, J. 2004. ‘Faculty Disputes’. Mind & Language 19: 503–33.

Davidson, D. 1967. ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’. In N. Rescher (ed.) ‘The Logic of Decision and Action’, 81–95. Pittsburgh.

Dreyfus, H. 2005. ‘Overcoming the Myth of the Mental’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79: 47–65.

Dwyer, S. & Pietroski, P. 1996. ‘Believing in Language’. Philosophy of Science 63: 338–73.

Field, H. 1994. ‘Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content’. Mind 103: 249–85.

Fodor, J. 1989. ‘Review Essay: Remnants of Meaning, by Stephen Schiffer’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50: 409–23.

Fodor, J. 1990. ‘Substitution Arguments and the Individuation of Beliefs’. In G. Boolos (ed.) ‘Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam’, Blackwell.

Fodor, J. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford.

Fodor, J. 2006. ‘Reason and Language’. In C. MacDonald (ed.) ‘McDowell and his Critics’, 22–45. Blackwell.

Frege, G. 1906. ‘A Brief Survey of my Logical Doctrines’. Cited as extracted in M. Beaney (ed.), The Frege Reader (Blackwell, 1997).

Gross, S. 1998/2001. ‘Essays on Linguistic Context-Sensitivity and its Philosophical Significance’. Doctoral dissertation. Published in Studies in Philosophy (Routledge).

Gross, S. 2005a. ‘The Biconditional Doctrine: Contra Kölbel on a ‘Dogma’ of Davidsonian Semantics’. Erkenntnis 62: 189–210.

Gross, S. 2005b. ‘The Nature of Semantics: On Jackendoff’s Arguments’. The Linguistic Review 22: 249–70.

Gross, S. 2005c. ‘Context-Sensitive Truth-Theoretic Accounts of Semantic Competence’. Mind & Language 20: 68–102.

Gross, S. 2006. ‘Can Empirical Theories of Semantic Competence Really Help Limn the Structure of Reality?’ Noûs 40: 43–81.

Hellman, G. 1989. Mathematics Without Numbers. Oxford.

Higginbotham, J. 1988. ‘Contexts, Models, and Meanings’. In R. Kempson (ed.) ‘Mental Representations’, 29–48. Cambridge.

Hornsby, J. 2005. ‘Semantic Knowledge and Practical Knowledge’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supp. vol. 79: 107–30.

Johnson, K. 2007. ‘Tacit and Accessible Understanding of Language’. Synthese 156: 253–79.

Kim, J. 1995. Knowledge of Meaning. MIT.

Kim, J. 2005. Physicalism, Or Something Near Enough. Princeton.

Kripke, S. 1979. ‘A Puzzle About Belief’. In A. Margalit (ed.) ‘Meaning and Use’, 239–83. D. Reidel.

Lepore, E. 1983. ‘What Model-Theoretic Semantics Cannot Do’. Synthese 54: 167–87.

Lepore, E. 1997. ‘Conditions on Understanding Language’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97: 41–60.

Longworth, G. 2008. ‘Linguistic Understanding and Knowledge’. Noûs 42: 50–79.

Ludlow, P. 1999. Semantics, Tense, and Time. MIT.

Matthews, R. 2003. ‘Does Linguistic Competence Require Knowledge of Language?’ In A. Barber (ed.) ‘Epistemology of Language’, 187–213. Oxford.

Nisbett, R. & Wilson, T. 1977. ‘On Telling More Than We Can Know’. Psychological Review 84: 231–59.

Patterson, D. 2008. ‘Understanding the Liar’. In J. C. Beall (ed.) ‘The Revenge of the Liar’, 197–224. Oxford.

Pelletier, J. & Schubert, L. 2003. ‘Mass Expressions’. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.) ‘Handbook of Philosophical Logic’, 265–350. Reidel, second ed.

Pietroski, P. 2003. ‘The Character of Natural Language Semantics’. In A. Barber (ed.) ‘Epistemology of Language’, 217–56. Oxford.

Pietroski, P. 2005. Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford.

Rumfitt, I. 1995. ‘Truth Conditions and Communication’. Mind 104: 827–62.

Sachs, J. 1967. ‘Recognition Memory for Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Connected Discourse’. Perception and Psychophysics 2: 437–42.

Schneider, S. 2005. ‘Direct Reference, Psychological Explanation, and Frege Cases’. Mind & Language 20: 423–47.

Searle, J. 1990. ‘Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion, and Cognitive Science’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 585–95.

Segal, G. 1994. ‘Priorities in the Philosophy of Thought’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supp. vol. 68: 107–30.

Segal, G. 2003. ‘Ignorance of Meaning’. In A. Barber (ed.) ‘Epistemology of Language’,415–30. Oxford.

Sider, T. 2003. ‘What’s So Bad About Overdetermination?’ Philosophy and Phenomenollogical Research 67: 719–26.

Snowden, P. 2003. ‘Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 1–29.

Soames, S. 1987. ‘Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content’. Philosophical Topics 15: 44–87.

Soames, S. 1989. ‘Semantics and Semantic Competence’. Philosophical Perspectives 3: 575–96.

Soames, S. forthcoming. ‘The Gap Between Meaning and Assertion’. In M. Hackl & R. Thornton (eds.) ‘Asserting, Meaning, and Implying’, Oxford.

Stalnaker, R. 1984. Inquiry. MIT.

Stalnaker, R. 1999. Context and Content. Oxford.

Stanley, J. 2005. ‘Hornsby on the Phenomenology of Speech’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supp. vol. 79: 131–45.

Stanley, J. & Szabó, Z. 2000. ‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’. Mind & Language 15: 219–61.

Stanley, J. & Williamson, T. 2001. ‘Knowing How’. Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–44.

Stich, S. 1978. ‘Beliefs and Sudoxastic States’. Philosophy of Science 45: 499–518.