naive physics, naive optics, perceptual errors, conceptual errors


Many adults hold mistaken beliefs concerning the behavior of mechanical motion and reflections. In the field of psychology this has been investigated in the areas of naïve physics and naïve optics. The interesting question regards where these false beliefs come from. Particularly thought-provoking is the case of errors which are at odds not only with (presumably or even actually) known physical/optical concepts, but also with what people would actually perceive. Some errors are in fact consistent with what people see in ecological conditions while others apparently are not. This has led to the former being referred to as perceptual errors and the latter as conceptual errors (Lawson and Bertamini 2006). We propose that many of these ‘conceptual errors’ are generalizations of what can be actually perceived under some conditions that are then incorrectly applied under others. In this sense, they can be thought of as a second way in which perception shapes naïve beliefs.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.


Barsalou, L.W. 2010. “Grounding cognition: Past, Present and Future”. Topics in Cognitive Science 2: 716-724.

Bertamini, M., Lawson, R. Jones, L. & Winters, M. 2010. “The Venus Effect in Real Life and in Photographs”, Attention Perception & Psychophysics 72:1948-1964. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1948

Bertamini, M., & Parks, T.E. 2005. “On what people know about images on mirrors”. Cognition 98: 85-104.

Bertamini, M., Spooner, A. & Hecht, H. 2003. “Naïve optics: Predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29(5):982-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.982

Bianchi, I. & Savardi, U. 2008. “The relationship perceived between the real body and the mirror image”, Perception 5:666–687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5744

Bianchi, I. & Savardi, U. 2009. Contrariety in plane mirror reflections. In U. Savardi (Ed.). “The perception and Cognition of contraries” (pp. 113-128). Milan:McGraw-Hill

Bianchi, I. & Savardi, U. 2012. “What fits in into a mirror: naïve beliefs on the field of view of mirrors”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38(5):1144-1158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027035

Bozzi, P. 1958. “Analisi fenomenologica del moto pendolare armonico”, Rivista di Psicologia 52(4):281-302. (English Translation by P. Bressan and P. Gaudiano 1989, “Phenomenological Analysis of Pendular Harmonic Motion.” Department of Psychology, UALR, 2801 South University, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA).

Bozzi, P. 1959. “Le condizioni del movimento ‘naturale’ lungo i piani inclinati”, Rivista di Psicologia LIII(II): 337-352 (English Translation by P. Bressan and P. Gaudiano 1989. “The Conditions for "Natural" Motion Along Inclined Planes”. Department of Psychology, UALR, 2801 South University, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA).

Bozzi, P. 1990. Fisica Ingenua [Naïve Physics]. Milano: Garzanti.

Croucher, C.J., Bertamini, M. & Hecht, H. 2002. “Naïve optics: Understanding the geometry of mirror reflections”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28:546-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.546

Dunker, K. 1939. “Induced Motion” in W. Ellis (Ed. and Trans.) A source book of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Hartcourt Brace (Reprinted from Psychologische Forschung, 1929, 12:180-259).

Frick, A., Huber, S., Reips, U.-D. & Krist, H. 2005. “Task Specific Knowledge of the Law of Pendulum Motion in Children and Adults”, Swiss Journal of Psychology 64(2): 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.64.2.103

Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gombrich, E. H., 1960. Art and Illusion. Oxford: Phaidon Press.

Gregory, R. 1996. Mirrors in Mind. New York: Freeman Spektrum.

Haig, N. D. 1993. “Reflections on inversion and reversion”, Perception 22:863-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p220863

Hecht, H. & Bertamini, M. 2000. “Understanding Projectile Acceleration”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26(2):730-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.730

Hegarty, M. 1992. “Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory and Cognition 18:1084-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1084

Huber, S. & Krist, H. 2004. “When Is the Ball Going to Hit the Ground? Duration Estimates, Eye Movements, and Mental Imagery of Object Motion”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30(3):431-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.431

Jansson, G. & Runeson, S. 1969. “Measurement of perceived oscillation”, Perception & Psychophysics 6:27-32.

Kaiser, M.K., Proffitt, D.R. & McCloskey, M. 1985. “The development of beliefs about falling objects”, Perception and Psychophysics 38:533-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207062

Kohler, W. 1938. The Place of Values in a World of Facts. New York: Liveright.

Lawson, R. & Bertamini, M. 2006. “Errors in judging information about reflections on mirrors”, Perception 35:1265-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5498

McAfee, E.A. & Profitt, D.R. 1991. “Understanding the surface orientation of liquids”. Cognitive Psychology 23: 122-130.

McCloskey, M. 1983a. “Intuitive Physics”, Scientific American 248:122-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0483-122

McCloskey, M. 1983b. Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner and A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A. & Green, B. 1980. “Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naïve beliefs about the motion of objects”, Science 210:1139-1141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.210.4474.1139

McCloskey, M., Washburn, A. & Felch, L. 1983. “Intuitive physics: The straight-down belief and its origin”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9:636-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.636

Navon D. 2001. “The Puzzle of Mirror Reversal: a View from Clockland”, Psycoloquy, 12:17.

Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. 2005. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Pittenger, J.B. 1989. “Detection of violation of the law of pendulum motion: Observers’ sensitivity to the relation between period and length”, Ecological Psychology 2:55-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0201_3

Profitt, D. R. & Gilden, D. L. 1989. “Understanding natural dynamics”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15:384-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.15.2.384

Profitt, D.R., Kaiser, M.K. & Whelan, S.M. 1990. “Understanding wheel dynamics”, Cognitive Psychology 22:342-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90007-Q

Runeson, S. 1974. “Constant velocity? Not perceived as such”, Psychological Research 37:3-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00309076

Savardi, U., Bianchi, I. & Bertamini, M. 2010. “Naïve predictions of motion in mirrors. From what we see to what we expect reflections to do”, Acta Psychologica 134:1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.008

Schwartz, D. L. 1999. “Physical Imagery: Kinematic versus Dynamic Models”, Cognitive Psychology 38:433-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0702

Shaffer, D. M. & McBeath, M. K. 2005. “Naïve Beliefs in Baseball: Systematic Distortion in Perceived Time of Apex for Fly Balls”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 31(6):1492-1501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1492

Shannon, B. 1976. “Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the physics of the layman”, Perception 5:241-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p050241

Sholl, M. J. & Liben, L. S. 1995. “Illusory tilt and Euclidean schemes as factors in performance on the water-level task”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21:1624-1638.

Smith, B. & Casati, R. 1994. “Naïve Physics: An Essay in Ontology”, Philospphical Psychology 7(2): 225-244.

Tabata, T. & Okuda, S. 2000. “Mirror reversal simply explained without recourse to psychological processes”, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7:170-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210737

Takano, Y. 1998. “Why does a mirror image look left-right reversed? A hypothesis of multiple processes”, Psychonomic Bullettin and Review 5(1):37-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209456

Takano, Y. & Tanaka, A. 2007. “Mirror reversal: empirical tests of competing accounts”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11:1555-1584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210601137102

Wallach, H. 1959. “The perception of motion”. Scientific American 201:56-60

Yates, J., Bessman, M., Dunne, M., Jertson, D., Sly, K. & Wendelboe, B. 1988. “Are conceptions of motion based on a naïve theory or on prototypes?” Cognition 29:251-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90026-1