•  
  •  
 

Keywords

Cynefin framework, library leadership, COVID-19

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate how university library leadership retrospectively applied the Cynefin framework to COVID-19 responses. Developed using the principles of complexity theory, the Cynefin framework is a sense-making framework that assists those who use it with decision making in ordered and un-ordered situations. The framework comprises five domains: (a) clear, (b) complicated, (c) complex, (d) chaotic, and (e) aware and confused. Because problems are ever-evolving, the cyclical nature of the Cynefin framework allows for and encourages transitions between domains. Through reflection on their experiences during the pandemic, library leaders can utilize the framework’s tenets to make future decisions.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

References

Childs, S. & McLeod, J. (2013). Tackling the wicked problem of ERM: Using the Cynefin framework as a lens. Records Management Journal, 23(3), 191-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-07-2013-0016

Cynefin Framework, The. (2020). Cognitive Edge. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://www.cognitive-edge.com/the-cynefin-framework/

Elford, W. (2012). A multi-ontology view of ergonomics: Applying the Cynefin Framework to improve theory and practice. Work, 41(1), 812-817. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0246-812

Kempermann, G. (2017). Cynefin as a reference framework to facilitate insight and decision-making in complex contexts of biomedical research. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11(634), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00634

Kurtz, C.F. & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and Complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0462

Mason, M. (2008). What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 25-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00413.x

McCollum, B. & Shea, K. (2018). Adaptive leadership: The leader’s advantage. InterAgency Journal, 9(1), 99-111.

McLeod, J. & Childs, S. (2013). A tool for analyzing qualitative data in information science? Library and Information Science Research, 35, 299-309.

Morrison, K. (2002). School Leadership and Complexity Theory. Taylor & Francis Group.

Pina E Cunha, M. & Vieira Da Cunha, J. (2006). Towards a complexity theory of strategy. Management Decision, 44(7), 839-50.

Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. Columbia University Press.

Download
COinS