•  
  •  
 

Keywords

academic libraries, Kansas libraries, late fees, library fines

Abstract

While there has been a general movement in public libraries away from fines for late return of materials, as they are perceived as a barrier to access (American Library Association, 2019), the situation on abolishing fines is not as clear in the academic library community and there is a general lack of literature on this topic concerning academic libraries.

The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate the structure of late fees for various materials in the 4-year public universities in Kansas to gain insight into current practice in academic libraries in Kansas. In addition, the researchers wanted to determine if all policy information related to late fees was freely available on pubic-facing web pages in each library’s website.

The library websites of each of the target universities (Emporia State University, Fort Hays State University, Kansas State University, Pittsburgh State University, University of Kansas, Wichita State University, and Washburn University) were searched for each institutions policy on return of library materials and any late fees charged. All institutions but one were found to provide details of late fee policies on their web pages, but the location of the policy information was not consistent across institutions and was not always obvious in the structure of the library websites.

The data showed a wide range of policies across the various universities. All universities had some form of fee structure related to late or lost items but there was little consistency. Fine amounts were also considered relative to the undergraduate tuition costs of each institution to see if this might explain the widely differing fee amounts.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

References

American Library Association. (2019). Resolution on Monetary Library Fines as a Form of Social Inequity. https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/aboutala/content/Resolution%20on%20Monetary%20Library%20Fines%20as%20a%20Form%20of%20Social%20Inequity-FINAL.pdf

Boehme, A., & Mihaly, K. (2018). Fine efficacy: An experimental study of the effect of daily fines on borrower return habits. University Libraries Faculty Publications, 53. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/ul_pub/53

Chung, F. (2021). Reconsidering overdue fines in the midst of a pandemic. Public Services Quarterly, 17(2), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2021.1899101

Helms, C. (2019). Eliminating overdue fines for undergraduates: A six-year review. Journal of Access Services, 16(4), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2019.1668793

Intahchomphoo, C., & Brown, M. (2021). Canadian university research libraries during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, 44(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v44i1.10910

Wilson, R. (2019). Kansas profile – now that’s rural: Kansas firsts. https://www.ksre.k-state.edu/news/stories/2019/01/Kansas-Profile-Kansas-firsts.html

Download

Share

COinS