Keywords
Library Classification, Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Perceptions, Academic Libraries, Catalogers
Abstract
Serving as a follow-up to Lund and Agbaji’s 2018 surveys of library employee preferences towards Dewey Decimal and Library of Congress Classification schemes, this study presents inferential comparisons between the responses of cataloging librarians’ and non-cataloging librarians perceptions and preferences towards DDC and LCC. The hypothesis for this research is that, based on the cataloger’s expertise in cataloging and classification relative to the average employee, they may have substantially different perceptions/preferences toward library classification schemes. The data, however, do not reflect such a difference. Instead, we find no statistically significant difference between the perceptions of catalogers and non-catalogers and only a small difference in preference exists, which can be explained by confounding variables. This suggests that although cataloging librarians have specialized knowledge about classification, their opinions about classification schemes are not distinct from their non-cataloging peers.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Lund, Brady D.
(2019)
"A Comparison of Cataloger and Non-Cataloger Responses to a Survey of Perceptions and Preference toward Dewey Decimal and Library of Congress Classification,"
Kansas Library Association College and University Libraries Section Proceedings:
Vol. 9:
No.
1.
https://doi.org/10.4148/2160-942X.1072
References
Cox, E. J., & Myers, A. K. D. (2010). What is a professional cataloger? Perception differences between professionals and paraprofessionals. Library Resources and Technical Services, 54(4), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.54n4.212
Lund, B. D., & Agbaji, D. A. (2018a). What scheme do we prefer? An examination of preference between Library of Congress and Dewey Decimal Classification among US-Based academic library employees. Knowledge Organization, 45(5), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-380
Lund, B. D., & Agbaji, D. A. (2018b). Use of Dewey Decimal Classification by academic libraries in the United States. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1517851
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Shorten, J., Seikel, M., & Ahrberg, J. H. (2005). Why do you still use Dewey? Academic libraries that continue with Dewey Decimal Classification. Library Resources and Technical Services, 49(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.49n2.123
Xu, H. (1996). The impact of automation on job requirements and qualifications for catalogers and reference librarians in academic libraries. Library Resources and Technical Services, 40(1), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.40n1.9
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
Included in
Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Higher Education Commons
