What Do Toilets Have to Do With It? Health, the Environment, and the Working Poor in Rural South Texas Colonias

Authors

Jo Rios, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi
Pamela Meyer, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi

Keywords

Rural Studies, Sociology, Geography

Abstract

This paper develops and tests an environmental health ecological framework between the quality of infrastructure, utilities and resident’s practices to health problems reported in three Nueces County, Texas colonias. Populated by predominantly low-income, minority families, these peri-urban settlements are characterized by substandard housing, lacking traditional sewage systems, potable drinking water and pluvial drainage. It was hypothesized that those without indoor toilets, pluvial drainage and regular garbage collection would be more likely to report health problems. The study found that keeping trash for over a week was statistically related to gastrointestinal illness and eye infections. Having indoor toilets in conjunction with substandard septic tanks was statistically related to gastrointestinal illness, respiratory problems and skin infections. The lack of pluvial drainage was statistically significantly, while not related to a particular disease. The argument is made that flooding problems may have contributed to the sanitation problems. Specifically, drainage problems affect the septic tanks and cause backflow to the indoor toilets. Although a small sample, the findings show that people who live in colonias are at risk for disease because structural measures to improve sanitation are not available.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Rios, Jo and Meyer, Pamela (2009) "What Do Toilets Have to Do With It? Health, the Environment, and the Working Poor in Rural South Texas Colonias," Online Journal of Rural Research & Policy: Vol. 4: Iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.4148/ojrrp.v4i2.77

References

1. Powell, Jamie. 2008. Colonias Get Infrastructure Upgrades. Caller-Times. June 28.

2. Albrecht, Don E., Carol Muford Albrecht, and Stan Albrecht. 2000. Poverty in Nonmetropolitan America: Impacts of Industrial, Employment, and Family Structure Variables. Rural Sociology 65 (1):87-103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00344.x

3. Fauth, Rebecca D. Tama Leventhal, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. 2008. Seven Years Later: Effects of a Neighborhood Mobility Program on Poor Black and Latino Adults’ Well-Being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 49 (2): 119-130.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002214650804900201
PMid:18649497 PMCid:3117324

4. Robert, Stephanie and James S. House. 2000. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health: An Enduring Sociological Problem. Pp. 79 – 97 in Handbook of Medical Sociology, Chloe E. Bird, Peter Conrad and Allen M. Fremont (eds.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

5. Link, Bruce G. and Jo C. Phelan. 2000. Evaluating the Fundamental Cause Explanation for Social Disparities in Health, pp. 33- 46 in Handbook of Medical Sociology, Chloe E. Bird, Peter Conrad and Allen M. Fremont (eds.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

6. House, James S., Victor Strecher, Helen L. Metzner, and Cynthia Robbins. 1986. Occupational Stress and Health Among Men and Women in the Tecumseh Community Health Study. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 27: 62-77.

7. Franzini, Luisa, Margaret Caughy, William Spears, and Maria Eugenia Fernandez Esquer. 2005. Neighborhood Economic Conditions, Social Processes, and Self-rated Health in Low-income Neighborhoods in Texas: A Multilevel Latent Variables Model. Social Science and Medicine 61: 1135-1150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.010

8. Mirowsky, John, Catherine E. Ross and John Reynolds. 2000. Links Between Social Status and Health, pp. 47-67 in Handbook of Medical Sociology, Chloe E. Bird, Peter Conrad and Allen M. Fremont (eds.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

9. Mulatu, Mesfin S. and Carmi Schooler. 2002. Causal Connections between SES and Health: Reciprocal Effects and Mediating Mechanisms. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 43: 22-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3090243
PMid:11949195

10. Syme, S. Leonard and Lisa F. Berkman. 2001. Social Class, Susceptibility, and Sickness. Pp. 24-29. in The Sociology of Health and Illness: Critical Perspectives, Peter Conrad (ed.). New York, New York: Worth Publishers.

11. Mirowsky, John, Catherine E. Ross and John Reynolds. 2000. Links Between Social Status and Health, pp. 47-67 in Handbook of Medical Sociology, Chloe E. Bird, Peter Conrad and Allen M. Fremont (eds.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

12. Antonowsky, Aaron. 1967. Social Class, Life Expectancy and Overall Mortality. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 45: 31-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3348839
PMid:6034566

13. Williams, David R. 1990. Socioeconomic Differentials in Health: A Review and Redirection. Social Psychology Quarterly 53: 81-99.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786672

14. Winkerby, Marilyn, Darius E. Jatulis, Erica Frank and Stephen P. Fortmann. 1992. Socioeconomic Status and Health: How Education, Income, and Occupation Contribute to Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease. American Journal of Public Health 82:816-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.82.6.816
PMid:1585961 PMCid:1694190

15. Naismith Engineering, Inc. 1998. Nueces County Comprehensive Colonia Planning Study prepared for and funded through the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs.

16. Steingraber, Sandra. 1997. Living Downstream, An Ecologist Looks at Cancer and the Environment. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.

17. Nurminen. T. M. Nurminen, C. Corvalán, and D. Briggs. 1996. Assessment of Health Effects.” Pp. 69-91 in Linkage Methods for Environment and Health Analysis, General Guidelines. United Nations Environment Programme, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization, Office of Global and Integrated Environmental Health.

18. Folinsbee, Lawrence. 1992. Human Health Effects of Air Pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives 100: 46.

19. The World Bank. 1992. World Development Report 1992, Development and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20. Murray, Christopher J. L. and Alan D. Lopez (Eds.). 1996. The Global Burden of Disease, Volume 1. Geneva: World Health Organization, Harvard School of Public Health and The World Bank.

21. National Research Council. 1994. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

22. Hepatitis A Associated with Consumption of Frozen Strawberries – Michigan. 1997. Morbidity and Mortalitiy Weekly Report. 45 (13): 288.

23. United Nations Population Division. 1996. World Population Prospects 1950 – 2050, The 1996 Revision. New York: United Nations.

24. Jamison, D.T., W.H. Moseley, A.R. Measham, J.L. Bobadilla. 1993. Disease and Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

25. Cech, I. 1992. Water and Sanitation Practices on the Texas - Mexico Border: Implications for Physicians on Both Sides. Southern Medical Journal 85:1053-1064.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199211000-00003
PMid:1439940

26. Sheilds, J. 1991. Ambient Air Arsenic Levels Along the Texas - Mexico Border. Journal of Air Waste Management Association 41: 827-831.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1991.10466880

27. Texas Department of Health. 1991. Epidemiology in Texas, 1991 Annual Report. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Health.

28. Texas Department of Health and Centers for Disease Control. 1992. An Investigation of a cluster of Neural Tube Defects in Cameron County, Texas. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Health.

29. World Resource Institute.1998. World Resources, 1998-99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

30. Dutton, Ronald J. 2000. Study of Health and Environmental Conditions in Texas Border Counties and Colonias. Austin TX: Texas Department of Health.

31. Rogers, G. 1993. Cinco Colonia Areas: Baseline Conditions in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Center for Housing and Urban Development.

32. Texas Department of Human Services. 1988. The Colonias Factbook: A Survey of Living Conditions in Rural Areas of South Texas and West Texas Border Counties. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Human Services.

33. International Boundary and Water Commission, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Water Commission. 1994. Binational Study Regarding the Presence of Toxic Substances in the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo and its Tributaries Along the boundary Portion Between the United States and Mexico. Dallas, TX: EPA Region 6, Final Report, September.

34. Akland, Gernal G., Margo Schwab, Hal Zenick, and Dale Pahl. 1997. An Interagency Partnership Applied to the Study of Environmental Health in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Environment International 23 (5): 595-609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(97)00064-0

35. Akland, Gernal G., Margo Schwab, Hal Zenick, and Dale Pahl. 1997. An Interagency Partnership Applied to the Study of Environmental Health in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Environment International 23 (5): 595-609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(97)00064-0

36. Rios, Jo Marie and Avelardo Valdez. 2001. The Relationship Between Infrastructure, Utilities and the Incidence of Illness in the Border Colonias. Journal of Border Health 5: 31 – 38.

37. Rios, Jo Marie and Avelardo Valdez. 2001. The Relationship Between Infrastructure, Utilities and the Incidence of Illness in the Border Colonias. Journal of Border Health 5: 31 – 38.

38. Naismith Engineering, Inc. 1998. Nueces County Comprehensive Colonia Planning Study prepared for and funded through the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs.

39. Babbie, Earl. 2004. The Practice of Social Research, 10th ed. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

40. Naismith Engineering, Inc. 1998. Nueces County Comprehensive Colonia Planning Study prepared for and funded through the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs.

41. Rios, Jo Marie and Avelardo Valdez. 2001. The Relationship Between Infrastructure, Utilities and the Incidence of Illness in the Border Colonias. Journal of Border Health 5: 31 – 38.

42. Meier, Kenneth J. and Jeffrey L. Brudney. 2002. Applied Statistics for Public Administration. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

43. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States 2000. Washington D. C.: Government Printing Office.

44. Norusis, Marija J. 2004. SPSS 11.0 Guide to Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

45. Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations. 2005. SB 425, 79 (R). Retrieved January 13, 2006. (http://www.capital.state.tx.us).

46. Nueces County Commissioners Court. 2007. Commissioners Court Minutes. May 30. Retrieved July 20, 2007. (http://www.co.nueces.tx.us/commissioners/minutes).

47. Carrillo, Roxanne. 2007. County Works to Alleviate Colonias Drainage Problems. KRIS-TV, July 7. Retrieved July 20, 2007. (http://www.kristv.com/global/story.asp?s=6755898&ClientType=Printable).

48. Texas State Senate. 2007. Senator Hinojosa Secures New Funding in State Budget for Education, Health and Colonias. May 28. Retrieved July 20, 2007. (http://www.senate.state.tx.us).

49. Rios, Jo Marie and Avelardo Valdez. 2001. The Relationship Between Infrastructure, Utilities and the Incidence of Illness in the Border Colonias. Journal of Border Health 5: 31 – 38.

50. Mirowsky, John, Catherine E. Ross and John Reynolds. 2000. Links Between Social Status and Health, pp. 47-67 in Handbook of Medical Sociology, Chloe E. Bird, Peter Conrad and Allen M. Fremont (eds.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.