•  
  •  
 

Keywords

Rural media, social media, online, economy, media management, localism

Abstract

Small rural media outlets are key sources of information, provide a site for local advertising, and are an important local voice in their communities. This paper examines how small market rural media are trying to survive under tough economic conditions, and how they are using new media as part of their strategy to remain viable. Interviews were conducted with managers at several small market newspapers, television, and radio groups in order to identify specific concerns and strategies about how they are managing their resources, how they are using new media, and how they envision their future. The results show that most media are struggling, but also find that local media are in a good position to make their new media content viable for their local audiences.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

References

1. Downie, Leonard, Jr. and Schudson, Michael. November/December, 2009. “The reconstruction of American journalism.” Columbia Journalism Review, p. 28.

2. Downie, Leonard, Jr. and Schudson, Michael. November/December, 2009. “The reconstruction of American journalism.” Columbia Journalism Review, 28-51.

3. Former editor of Rocky Mountain News, personal communication, June 2009.

4. Smith, Ken, and Wiltse, Eric. 2005. “Rate-setting procedures for preprint advertising at nondaily newspapers.” Journal of Media Economics, 18, 1, pp. 55-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327736me1801_4

5. Downie, Leonard, Jr. and Schudson, Michael. November/December, 2009. “The reconstruction of American journalism.” Columbia Journalism Review, 28-51.

6. Morton, J. June/July 2009. “Not dead yet.” American Journalism Review, 48.

7. John Stevenson, president, National Newspaper Association, personal communication, January 2009.

8. Bradshaw, K., Foust, J., and Bernt, J. 2005. “Local television news anchors public appearances.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 2, pp. 166-181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_2

9. Rumpza, B. and Bellmont, B. September 24, 2009. “Survey: Americans increase use of radio and online news sources; Daily newspaper and television use drops.” ARAnet. Retrieved on January 23, 2010, from http://www.aranetonline.com/MediaRoom.aspx#2.

10. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

11. Hachten, W. A. 2005. The troubles of journalism: A critical look at what’s right and wrong with the press. (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

12. Picard, Robert G. 1989. Media economics: Concepts and issues. London: Sage.

13. Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., and Towse, R. (2008). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage, p. 1.

14. Hachten, W. A. 2005. The troubles of journalism: A critical look at what’s right and wrong with the press. (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15. Bakker, P., and Sadaba, C. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on users.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., and Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. pp. 86-101.

16. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

17. Picard, Robert G. 1989. Media economics: Concepts and issues. London: Sage. p. 7.

18. Picard, Robert G. 1989. Media economics: Concepts and issues. London: Sage, p. 9.

19. Picard, Robert G. 1989. Media economics: Concepts and issues. London: Sage.

20. Bakker, P., and Sadaba, C. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on users.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., and Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. pp. 86-101.

21. Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., and Towse, R. 2008. The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage.

22. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

23. Hachten, W. A. 2005. The troubles of journalism: A critical look at what’s right and wrong with the press. (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

24. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

25. Washkuch, F. October, 2009. “Major news organizations calculate cost of charging readers for online content.” PR Week, 12, 22, p. 23.

26. Hachten, W. A. 2005. The troubles of journalism: A critical look at what’s right and wrong with the press. (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

27. Led by Facebook, Twitter, global time spent on social media sites up 82% year over year. January 22, 2010. Nielsen Wire. Retrieved on February 25, 2010 from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/led-by-facebook-twitter-global-time-spent-on-social-media-sites-up-82-year-over-year/.

28. Boulder air collision. February 9, 2010. CBS 4 Denver. Retrieved on February 9, 2010 from http://cbs4denver.com/localslideshows/Boulder.Air.Collision.20.1476225.html.

29. Smith, H. (2010, February 9). Anchor. The Early Show.

30. Bakker, P., and Sadaba, C. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on users.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., and Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. p. 87.

31. Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., and Towse, R. 2008. The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage.

32. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. p. 8. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

33. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. p. 1. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

34. Ala-Fossi, M., et al. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on business models in the media industries – A sector-by-sector analysis.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., & Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. p. 159.

35. Ala-Fossi, M., et al. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on business models in the media industries – A sector-by-sector analysis.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., & Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. pp. 149-169.

36. Ala-Fossi, M., et al. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on business models in the media industries – A sector-by-sector analysis.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., & Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. p. 158.

37. Ala-Fossi, M., et al. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on business models in the media industries – A sector-by-sector analysis.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., & Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. pp. 149-169.

38. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. p. 5. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

39. Ala-Fossi, M., et al. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on business models in the media industries – A sector-by-sector analysis.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., & Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. pp. 149-169.

40. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

41. Ala-Fossi, M., et al. 2008. “The impact of the Internet on business models in the media industries – A sector-by-sector analysis.” In Kung, Lucy, Picard, Robert G., & Towse, R. (Eds.). The Internet and the mass media. London: Sage. pp. 149-169.

42. Coates, D., Bredholt, R., Holley, J., Johnson, K., and Medolera, K. 2010. Vocus State of the Media Report 2009/2010. Retrieved on January 12, 2010, from http://www.vocus.com/Email/10/Jan/PRWP/download.html.

43. Stiernstedt, F. 2008. “Maximizing the power of entertainment: The audience commodity in contemporary radio.” The Radio Journal, 6, 2&3, pp. 113-127.

44. Mannion, Elgin and Konstantinos, Zougris. 2009. “Metro-nonmetro Economic Growth and Convergence in the Plains States-Rethinking the Rural-Urban Relationship in a Global Economy.” The Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy 4.1, pp. 1-21.

45. Luther, Vicki B. 2007. “Hometown Competitiveness: A Come Back-Give Back Approach to Rural Development.” The Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy 4, pp. 1-10.

46. Armstrong, Cory L.; Wood, Michelle L. M.; and Nelson, Michelle R. March 2006. “Female news professionals in local and national broadcast news during the buildup to the Iraq War. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 1, pp. 78-94.

47. Bradshaw, K., Foust, J., and Bernt, J. 2005. “Local television news anchors public appearances.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 2, pp. 166-181.

48. Hilliard, R., and Keith, M. 2005. The Quieted Voice: The Rise and Demise of Localism in American Radio. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

49. Hood, L. 2007. “Radio reverb: The impact of “local” news reimported to its own community.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 1, pp. 1-19.

50. “The end of radio.” March 2005. Wired 13, 3, cover.

51. Hilliard, R., and Keith, M. 2005. The Quieted Voice: The Rise and Demise of Localism in American Radio. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

52. Spence, P., Lachlan, K., McIntyre, JJ and Seeger, M. 2009. “Serving the public interest in a crisis: Radio and its unique role.” Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 16, 2, pp. 144-159.

53. Torosyan, G., and Munro, C. 2010. “EARwitness testimony: Applying listener perspectives to develop a working concept of “localism” in broadcast radio.” Journal of Radio & Audio Media 17, 1, forthcoming.

54. According to the definition of the Great Plains from Online Journal of Rural Research & Policy’s home page, most of the interviewees were in the Great Plains region. However, two interviews were conducted with media managers who were located one county away from the official “plains” zone. Because the counties are still rural and have close ties with their next-door counties, the information gleaned from those interviews is still relevant to the overall conclusion of this article.

55. Hesse-Biber, S. and Leavy, P. 2006. The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

56. Hesse-Biber, S. and Leavy, P. 2006. The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

57. Mannion, Elgin and Konstantinos, Zougris. 2009. “Metro-nonmetro Economic Growth and Convergence in the Plains States-Rethinking the Rural-Urban Relationship in a Global Economy.” The Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy 4.1, pp. 1-21.

58. Luther, Vicki B. 2007. “Hometown Competitiveness: A Come Back-Give Back Approach to Rural Development.” The Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy 4, pp. 1-10.

Share

COinS