Biosecurity, Veterinarian Practices, Farm Animal Species, Biocontainment, Agroterrorism, Biosecurity
Biosecurity programs can be discussed from many perspectives. In many cases, biosecurity may be regulated state or federal programs with law enforcement - the goals of which are to protect the "national" livestock resources and protect consumer interests. Alternatively, these programs may be producer level programs that are voluntarily established for protection of personal livestock investments. A core principle in the definition of "biosecurity" is the desire to prevent the introduction of disease. When infectious disease is present on a farm or in a region, the term "biocontainment" may be used to describe programs aimed at confinement of the diseases to that farm or region such that it does not spread to other farms. Veterinarians are intimately involved in the maintenance of health and in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. When confronting an ongoing disease diagnosis and treatment situation, biocontainment can be readily implemented because the effects are apparent. However, when working to maintain a healthy herd, biosecurity practices may be more challenging to enforce because the threat is neither apparent nor seems eminent. An additional perspective on biosecurity relates to zoonotic diseases. Animal handlers and veterinarians are at risk for disease transmission from the animal to humans as part of their normal daily work habits. This chronic and persistent exposure may lead to complacency regarding risk if the people involved have never knowingly suffered disease. Thus, biosecurity can be a challenging concept for farm managers and veterinarians to apply in field settings.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Anderson, David E.
"Survey of Biosecurity Practices Utilized by Veterinarians Working with Farm Animal Species,"
Online Journal of Rural Research & Policy:
1. Hueston WD, Taylor JD. Protecting US cattle: the role of national biosecurity programs. Vet Clin Food Anim 2002;18:177-196.
2. Dargatz DA, Garry FB, Traub-Dargatz JL. An introduction to biosecurity of cattle operations. Vet Clin Food Anim 2002;18:1-5.
3. Elchos B, Scheftel J. Discussion of the Compendium of Veterinary Standard Precautions: preventing zoonotic disease transmission in veterinary personnel. Zoonoses Public Health 2008;55:526-528.
4. Benedict KM, Morley PS, Van Metre DC. Characteristics of biosecurity and infection control programs at veterinary teaching hospitals. J AM Vet med Assoc 2008;233:767-773.
5. Morley PS. Surveillance for nosocomial infections in veterinary hospitals. Vet Clin Equine 2004;20:561-576.
6. Cardinale E, Tall F, Guèyeb EF, Cisse M, Salvat G. Risk factors for Campylobacter spp. infection in Senegalese broiler-chicken flocks. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 64 (2004) 15–25.
7. Reinbold JB, Coetzee JF, Hollis L, et al. Comparison of transmission of Anaplasma marginale infection using needle-free and standard needle injection. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Convention of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners. September 20-22, 2007, Vancouver, Canada: 262.
8. Ortiz-Pelaez A, Pfeiffer DU. Use of data mining techniques to investigate disease risk classification as a proxy for compromised biosecurity of cattle herds in Wales. BMC Veterinary Research 2008, 4:24 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/4/24).
9. Brennan ML, Kemp R, Christley RM. Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 84 (2008) 242–260.
10. Noremark M, Frossling J, Lewerin SS. Application of Routines that Contribute to On-farm Biosecurity as Reported by Swedish Livestock Farmers. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010 May 24. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123466892/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0]
11. Thunes C, Carpenter TE. Biosecurity practices and travel history of individuals exhibiting livestock at the 2005 California State Fair. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007:231:581-585.
12. Smith DR. Epidemiological tools for biosecurity and biocontainment. Vet Clin Food Anim 200218:157-176.
13. Kelly AM. Veterinary medicine in the 21st century: the challenge of biosecurity. ILAR Journal 2005;46:62-64.
14. Moore DA, Payne M. An evaluation of dairy producer emergency preparedness and farm security education. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:2052-2057.
15. Kosal M, Anderson DE. An unaddressed issue of agricultural terrorism: a case study on feed security. Journal of Animal Science, 2004;82(11):3394-3400.
16. Wrathall AE, Simmons HA, Bowles DJ, Jones S. Biosecurity strategies for conserving valuable livestock genetic resources. Reprod, Fertil, Develop 2004;16:103-112.
17. Morley PS. Biosecurity of veterinary practices. Vet Clin Food Anim 2002; 18:133-155.
18. Smith DR. Epidemiological tools for biosecurity and biocontainment. Vet Clin Food Anim 200218:157-176.
19. Morley PS. Surveillance for nosocomial infections in veterinary hospitals. Vet Clin Equine 2004; 20:561-576.
20. Smith BP, House JK, Magdesian KG, et al. Principles of an infectious disease control program for preventing nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract diseases in large animal veterinary hospitals. J AM vet med Assoc 2004; 225:1186-1195.
21. Morley PS. Surveillance for nosocomial infections in veterinary hospitals. Vet Clin Equine 2004; 20:561-576.
22. Smith BP, House JK, Magdesian KG, et al. Principles of an infectious disease control program for preventing nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract diseases in large animal veterinary hospitals. J AM vet med Assoc 2004; 225:1186-1195.