Population Aging, Aging-Friendly Communities, Rurality


“Aging-friendly” communities are environments where people can live their entire lives rather than having to relocate because of age-related changes. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent to which middle-aged, long-term residents in Wisconsin perceived their communities to be aging-friendly, and to determine whether these perceptions varied according to county rurality. Rurality was measured using the Index of Relative Rurality, and is based on four dimensions: population, population density, extent of urban area, and remoteness. The Index of Relative Rurality was combined with the USDA urban influence code to categorize counties into the following spheres: the “Metropolitan Sphere”, the “Rural-Metro Interface”, and the “Rural Sphere”. It was hypothesized that persons residing in metropolitan counties will be more likely to perceive that their communities have aging-friendly characteristics than those residing in rural counties, and this will be particularly true with regard to characteristics related to transportation and health care services. The hypothesis was supported. Respondents residing in metro and rural-metro counties perceived a higher prevalence of aging-friendly community characteristics than those in rural counties, particularly with regard to transportation, health care services, and community connectedness.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


Scharlach, A. E. (2009). Creating aging-friendly communities. Generations, 33(2), 5-11.

World Health Organization (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/ageing/age_friendly_cities_guide/en/index.html.

Vincent, G. K., & Velkoff, V. A. (2010). The Next Four Decades: The Older Population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. Current Population Reports, P25-1138. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.

Rogers, C. C. (2002). Rural health issues for the older population, Rural America, 17( 2), 1-7.

Gallardo, R. (2010). Rural America in the 2000s: Age. Southern Rural Development Center and the Daily Yonder. Map used by permission. Retrieved from: http:/www.dailyyonder.com/rural-america-2000s-population/2010/07/12/2849.

Austin, C., McClelland, R., Perrault, E., & Sieppert, J. (2009). The Elder-Friendly Communities Program. Generations, 33(2), 87-90.

Buczko, W. (2001). Rural Medicare beneficiaries’ use of rural and urban hospitals, The Journal of Rural Health, 17(1), 53-58.

Schoenberg, N. E., & Coward, R. T., (1998). Residential differences in attitudes about barriers to using community-based services among older adults. Journal of Rural Health, 14(4), 295-304.

Waldorf, B. 2007. What is Urban and What is Rural in Indiana? Research Paper. Purdue Center for Regional Development, PCRD-R-4.

Waldorf, B. 2007. What is Urban and What is Rural in Indiana? Research Paper. Purdue Center for Regional Development, PCRD-R-4.

National Association of Area Agencies on Aging. (2007). The Maturing of America–Getting Communities on Track for an Aging Population. Retrieve from:

National Association of Area Agencies on Aging. (2006, September 27). Press release: New Study Finds America’s Communities Are Not Prepared for an Aging Population. Retrieved from:

National Association of Area Agencies on Aging, & the MetLife Foundation (2007). A Blueprint for Action: Developing a Viable Community for All Ages. Retrieved from:

National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (2011). The Maturing of America: Communities Moving Forward for an Aging Population, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from:

Henderson J., & Akers, M. (2009). Recession catches rural America. Economic Review (Federal Reserve of Kansas City), First Quarter, 65-87. Retrieved from: