•  
  •  
 

Keywords

Newspapers, Organizational Ecology, Competition, Survival

Abstract

Organizational ecologists follow the life histories of organizational populations, studying events such as founding, disbanding, and mergers. Newspaper organizations, for example, are often far from rational in their decision making to start, operate and end business practices. For this study, two daily papers located in rural states are analyzed within the context of organizational ecology, which has evolved from the physical sciences. For the larger market, rural-state newspaper, managers took an instrumental approach of quickly adapting new trends and technology. Because of economic uncertainties, a dismantling of such variations occurred. For the smaller market, rural-state newspaper, an institutional approach was most prevalent. Strong family ties and an assortment of family business ventures such as the streaming of high school sports supported the ability of this newspaper to continue business as usual throughout the timeframe of the study. Avoiding risk resulted in a stronger financial situation. This study indicates ecological analysis of newspapers is an attractive research method when organizations are subject to strong inertial pressures and face changeable, uncertain futures, as is the case in newspapers today.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

References

1. McIntosh, R. P. (1985). The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608537

2. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). "Organizations and Social Structure" in Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Harvard: U. Press, 3-27.

3. Edmonds, R. (2012). Newspapers: Building Digital Revenues Proves Painfully Slow, retrieved online on August 1, 2012 from: www.Stateofmedia.org.

4. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). "Organizations and Social Structure" in Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Harvard: U. Press, 3-27.

5. Perman, S. (2006). Taking the Pulse of Family Business, Bloomberg Businessweek, retrieved on April 23, 2012 from: http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/feb2006/sb20060210_476491.htm.

6. Pompeo, J. (2010). Check out 10 of the Fastest Growing Private Media Companies in the U.S. retrieved on April 18, 2012 from: www.businessinsider.com/check-out-10-of-the-fastestgrowing-private- media-companies-in-the-us-2010-8.

7. Moos, J. (2012) Media General to sell most of its newspapers to Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, retrieved on April 18, 2012 from: http://www.poynter.org.

8. Leach, D. & Leahy, J. (1991). Ownership Structures, Control and the Performance of Large British Companies. Economic Journal.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234893

9. Ward, J. (2002). “The Family Business Advantage: Unconventional Strategy”, Families in Business. 3.

10. Ward, J.L. (2005). Added Family Values. Families in Business 22, 70-71.

11. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). "Organizations and Social Structure" in Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Harvard: U. Press, 3-27.

12. Carroll, G.R. & Hannan, M.T. (1995). Organizations in Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.

13. Carroll, G.R. & Hannan, M.T. (2000). The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

14. Carroll, G.R. & Hannan, M.T. (2000). The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

15. Lowrey, W. (2012) Organization ecology and emerging media: A case study paper presented at AEJMC, Chicago.

16. Brandt, E., Kull, P & Björkdahl, J. (2007). Acquisition strategy: A case study within family businesses. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Student Thesis.

17. Census Bureau, (2010) Nevada State Office of Rural Health, retrieved Aug. 2, 2013 from: http://www.medicine.nevada.edu/orh/databk13.html.

18. Office of Local Government (2008). Department of Agricultural Economics, retrieved Aug. 7, 2013 from: http://krhw.net/urban.html.

19. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). "Organizations and Social Structure" in Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Harvard: U. Press, 3-27.

20. Baum, J.A.C. & Singh, J.V. (1994). Organizational Hierarchies and Evolutionary Processes: Some Reflections on a Theory of Organizational Evolution. In J.A.C. Baum & J.V. Singh (Eds.). Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (pp 3-20). New York: Oxford University Press.

21. Kingsley, A. (2010). A tale of two newsrooms, retrieved on April 18 from: http://archives.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/.

22. Baum, J.A.C. & Singh, J.V. (1994). Organizational Hierarchies and Evolutionary Processes: Some Reflections on a Theory of Organizational Evolution. In J.A.C. Baum & J.V. Singh (Eds.). Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (pp 3-20). New York: Oxford University Press.

23. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). "Organizations and Social Structure" in Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Harvard: U. Press, 3-27.

24. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). "Organizations and Social Structure" in Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Harvard: U. Press, 3-27.



Share

COinS