Abstract

In order to gain regulatory approval to market a new seed product derived with biotechnology, grain and forage composition data must be collected from field trials, and summaries must be reported to various government agencies. Currently, both tests of differences in composition between a genetically modified organism (GMO) and its control and tests of equivalence of the GMO to conventional genotypes are required by regulatory agencies. Bayesian analyses offer an attractive option for regulatory assessments by expressing results that can be interpreted more easily by a wide audience and by providing more ways to examine various hypotheses of interest. In order to extend Bayesian methodology for application to different compositional analytes, and to take advantage of the information obtained in previous experiments, the use of informative prior distributions for composition studies is proposed. Methods for determining suitable informative prior distributions analytically are shown in four situations: (1) eliciting opinions from an expert, (2) finding the best fit from an overdetermined set of summary statistics from one previous study, (3) performing a meta-analysis of summary statistics from previous studies with an assumed common prior distribution, and (4) performing a different meta-analysis with the prior distribution determined by a mixture of different assumed prior distributions from previous studies. Examples from soybean composition studies are used to illustrate these techniques.

Keywords

Bayes, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Prior Distribution, Genetically Modified Organism, Regulatory, Composition

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 29th, 11:30 AM

BAYESIAN MCMC ANALYSES FOR REGULATORY ASSESSMENTS OF FOOD COMPOSITION

In order to gain regulatory approval to market a new seed product derived with biotechnology, grain and forage composition data must be collected from field trials, and summaries must be reported to various government agencies. Currently, both tests of differences in composition between a genetically modified organism (GMO) and its control and tests of equivalence of the GMO to conventional genotypes are required by regulatory agencies. Bayesian analyses offer an attractive option for regulatory assessments by expressing results that can be interpreted more easily by a wide audience and by providing more ways to examine various hypotheses of interest. In order to extend Bayesian methodology for application to different compositional analytes, and to take advantage of the information obtained in previous experiments, the use of informative prior distributions for composition studies is proposed. Methods for determining suitable informative prior distributions analytically are shown in four situations: (1) eliciting opinions from an expert, (2) finding the best fit from an overdetermined set of summary statistics from one previous study, (3) performing a meta-analysis of summary statistics from previous studies with an assumed common prior distribution, and (4) performing a different meta-analysis with the prior distribution determined by a mixture of different assumed prior distributions from previous studies. Examples from soybean composition studies are used to illustrate these techniques.