NPP > JOURNALS > KAESRR > Vol. 0 (1900) > Iss. 1
Keywords
Cattlemen's Day, 1987; Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 87-309-S; Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 514; Beef; Implant; Heifers; Spayed
Abstract
Heifers that were flank-spayed plus rumen-ovarian autografted (FS+A) responded similarly to Ralgro®, Synovex-H®, and Synovex-S® implants on' pasture. Grazing heifers spayed by the Kimberling-Rupp technique also responded similarly to Synovex-H and Synovex-S implants. During the finishing phase, heifers implanted with Synovex-S gained 5.7% faster than heifers implanted with Ralgro, and those implanted with Synovex-H were intermediate in performance. There was no statistical interaction between spaying method and implant treatment during either the grazing or finishing phases.
First page
80
Last page
82
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Laudert, S.B.; Kuhl, Gerry L.; and Edwards, A.J.
(1987)
"Implant comparisons in grazing and finishing spayed heifers,"
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports:
Vol. 0:
Iss.
1.
https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.2408
