Swine day, 2005; Summary Publication of Report of Progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 964; Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 06-63-S; Pork; Pre-rigor injection; Citrate; Acetate; Phosphate; Swine


Forty pork carcass sides were assigned to one of four treatments: pre-rigor citrate (CIT) or acetate (ACE) injection, post-rigor phosphate plus salt (PHOS) injection, and noninjected control (CON). Loins in 20 sides were injected 50 min post-mortem with 4% solutions of CIT or ACE to approximately 110% of projected loin weights, and 10 PHOS-treated loins were injected at 24 h postmortem to 106.6% with a 4.4% PHOS plus 2.2% salt solution. Although CIT increased pH (P<0.05), neither CIT nor ACE altered (P>0.05) glycolytic metabolite concentrations. The pH increase in CIT-injected muscle was most likely due to its buffering ability rather than glycolytic inhibition. Citrate improved tenderness without the detrimental effects on color or flavor found with PHOS plus salt, but neither CIT nor ACE altered glycolytic metabolites or improved firmness, wetness, or fresh visual color over CON. Poor flavor attributes of the ACE treatment will discourage its use as an ingredient for pork enhancement solutions.; Swine Day, 2005, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2005

First page


Last page


Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.