soybean, nitrogen, inoculation, fertilization, genotypes


The United States (US) and Argentina (ARG) account for more than 50% of the global soybean production. Soybean yields are determined by the genotype, environment, and management practices (G × E × M) interaction. Overall, 50-60% of soybean nitrogen (N) demand is usually met by the biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) process. An unanswered scientific question concerns the ability of BNF process to satisfy soybean N demand at varying yield levels. The overall objective of this project was to study the contribution of N via utilization of different N strategies, evaluating soybean genotypes released in different eras. Four field experiments were conducted during the 2016 season: Ottawa (east central Kansas, US), Ashland Bottoms (central Kansas, US), Rossville (central Kansas, US), and Oliveros (Santa Fe province, Argentina). A wide variety of historical and modern soybean genotypes were used (from the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s release decades) in the US and ARG, all tested under three N management strategies (S1: non-N applied but inoculated, S2: all N provided by fertilizer, and S3: late-N applied) and all seeds inoculated. At Ottawa, the study was planted in an area without previous soybean history with yields ranging from 21 to 30 bu/a. Modern genotype (2010) increased yields by 15% relative to the other varieties. As related to the N management approach, higher yields occurred when the N nutrition was based on S2 (overall 10% increase). At Ashland Bottoms, yields ranged from 47 to 65 bu/a, and the 1990s variety out-yielded the rest of the varieties by 13%. There was not statistical significance for N management at this location. At Rossville, yields ranged from 37 to 85 bu/a, with higher yields observed for the modern genotype (released after 2010). Regarding N strategies, S2 increased yields by 18% compared to S1. At ARG, yield ranged from 40 to 74 bu/a, with modern soybean varieties (released after 2010) yielding 34% greater than the rest of the varieties. Nitrogen application S2 increased yields by 5% when compared to the S1 strategy. Relative to yield potential, yield levels in Argentina were similar to those in central Kansas (Ashland Bottoms and Rossville).

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.