drought tolerance, soil-moisture sensor, evapotranspiration
Performance of ‘Innovation’ zoysiagrass was evaluated under four irrigation regimes: a) routine irrigation (1.2 inches weekly); b) evapotranspiration (ET)-based irrigation (60% of estimated ET); c) soil water sensor (SWS)-based irrigation; and d) no irrigation. The SWS-based irrigation method reduced water application by 72% and 56%, respectively, compared to routine or ET-based irrigation. Visual turf quality of turf receiving SWS-based irrigation remained above the minimal acceptable level throughout the study. Innovation zoysiagrass sustained acceptable quality for more than 21 days with no irrigation, and nonirrigated turf recovered fully within four weeks after irrigation treatments ceased and turf was well irrigated. Soil water sensors are useful for saving irrigation water, and Innovation zoysiagrass demonstrated good drought tolerance and recovery after drought.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Chhetri, Manoj; Fry, Jack; Kennelly, Megan; Bremer, Dale; and Hoyle, Jared
"Water Savings and ‘Innovation’ Zoysiagrass Quality in Response to Irrigation Strategy,"
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports: